^{page 321 note a–a} et cetera B

^{page 321 note b} A has scaccarum

^{page 321 note c} B ends

^{page 321 note a–a} et cetera B, C

^{page 321 note b} B, C end

^{page 322 note a} Om. in C

^{page 322 note b} ballivis C

^{page 324 note a} quam B, C

^{page 324 note b} parrochiam B, C

^{page 324 note c} parrochia B, C

^{page 324 note d} Berdeys B, C

^{page 324 note e} Sic in all texts; not impossible, but ? rectius que

^{page 324 note f} Heþne C

^{page 324 note g} Henr(icus) B, C

^{page 324 note h} Perur C

^{page 324 note i} Talebot B, C

^{page 324 note j} Wereburge B, C

^{page 324 note k} Om. in C

^{page 324 note l} Insert et C

^{page 324 note m} Om. in B, C

^{page 324 note n} laghedayes B, C

^{page 324 note o} baillivum B,C

^{page 324 note p} Insert mea B, C

^{page 324 note q} B ends with T', C ends

^{page 324 note 1} From the details in this charter it is clear that in this part of Kent a ‘yoke’ was a sixth part of a suling.

^{page 325 note a} B, C end

^{page 325 note a} Om. in C

^{page 326 note a} Windhull' C

^{page 326 note b} Om. in C

^{page 326 note a} Dakeham B, C

^{page 326 note b} Insert hac B, C

^{page 326 note c} ipsos B, C

^{page 326 note d} acquietabimus B, C

^{page 326 note e} ballivos C

^{page 326 note f–f} Om. in B, C

^{page 326 note g–g} Om. in B, C

^{page 326 note h} B ends with T', C ends

^{page 327 note 1} The rubrics in B and C for no. 404 add: Hec duplex est.

^{page 328 note a} Estlonde B, Estlond' C

^{page 328 note b} Hou B, C

^{page 328 note c} Om. in C

^{page 328 note a} Expansion from PRO foot

^{page 329 note 1} The rubrics in B and C for no. 409 read: Hec duplex est.

^{page 329 note a} Boxle B, C

^{page 329 note b–b} Om. in B, C

^{page 329 note c} Estlande B, C

^{page 329 note d} Hou B, C

^{page 329 note e} Om. in C

^{page 329 note a} Om. in C

^{page 330 note a} Om. in C

^{page 330 note a} Suthedun' B, C

^{page 330 note b} Windhull' B, C

^{page 330 note c–c} Om. in C

^{page 330 note d} unquam B, C

^{page 330 note e} A has pertinente(m)

^{page 330 note f} B ends with T', C ends

^{page 331 note a} A has Ruere (in error); B, C have Evere (cf., witness list of no. 416)

^{page 331 note b} Om. in C

^{page 331 note a} Paddok'lande B, Paddokeslande C

^{page 331 note b} marisco B, C

^{page 331 note c} possit B, C

^{page 331 note d} pacandum B, C

^{page 331 note e} B ends with T', C ends

^{page 332 note a} Hou B, C

^{page 332 note b} Insert ‘viz., in the parish of All Saints, Hoo’ B, C

^{page 332 note c–c} ‘in the same vill of Hoo’ B, C

^{page 332 note d} Om. in C

^{page 332 note a} Watesand' C

^{page 333 note a} Om. in C

^{page 333 note a} Om. in C

^{page 334 note a} Om. in C

^{page 334 note a} Om. in C

^{page 335 note a} Christina B, C

^{page 335 note b} c. B, carta C

^{page 335 note c} A has annuales

^{page 335 note d} Babbroc B, C

^{page 335 note e} parrochia C

^{page 335 note f} c. B, carte C

^{page 335 note g} Om. in B, C

^{page 335 note h} Insert et demanda B, C

^{page 335 note i–i} Om. in A, supplied from B, C (see note)

^{page 335 note j} Insert concessio et B, C

^{page 335 note k} B ends with T', C ends

^{page 335 note l} Reading uncertain, possibly Turberto

^{page 335 note a} Windhull' C

^{page 335 note b} Om. in C

^{page 335 note a} Om. in C

^{page 336 note a} Om. in C

^{page 336 note a} Om. in C

^{page 337 note a} Balbroc C

^{page 337 note b} c. B, car. C

^{page 337 note c} sancte B, C

^{page 337 note d} Suthdune B, Suthdun' C

^{page 337 note e} Windhull' C

^{page 337 note f} Om. m B, C

^{page 337 note g} Insert et C

^{page 337 note h} possit B, C

^{page 337 note i} Sic in A; ob' B, C

^{page 337 note j} pacandum B, C

^{page 337 note k} Om. in B

^{page 337 note l} B ends with T', C ends

^{page 337 note m} A has filii

^{page 337 note a} Windh(u)lle B, Windhull' C

^{page 337 note b} Wstfeld' B, Westfeld' C

^{page 337 note c} Windh(u)lle B, Windhullu C

^{page 337 note d} Havedland' B, C

^{page 337 note e} Om. in C

^{page 337 note f} Pettfeld' B, C

^{page 338 note g} unquam B, C

^{page 338 note h} A has pertinente(m)

^{page 338 note i} B ends with T', C ends

^{page 338 note j} Sic in A, but in other deeds called Ralph (e.g., no. 428)

^{page 338 note k} A has Luvetti, but cf. nos. 423, 428

^{page 338 note a} Westfeld' B, C

^{page 338 note b} Petfeld B, C

^{page 338 note c} ab B, C

^{page 338 note d} unquam B, C

^{page 338 note e} michi C

^{page 338 note f} A has pertinente(m)

^{page 338 note g} B ends with T', C ends

^{page 338 note h} Sic in A, ? rectius Dakaham

^{page 339 note a} Om. in C

^{page 339 note a} Om. in C

^{page 339 note a} Om. in C

^{page 340 note a} Salemun B, C

^{page 340 note b} Om. in C

^{page 340 note a} palmere C

^{page 340 note b–b} Or ‘in the common marsh’; B has in communi in marisco, C has in communi marisco

^{page 340 note c} Dakeham C

^{page 340 note d} Palm' C

^{page 340 note e} Om. in C

^{page 340 note a} Windhulle C

^{page 340 note b} Om. in C

^{page 341 note a} Insert et C

^{page 341 note b} Possibly scilicet; lower case s in B, upper case in C

^{page 341 note c} Om. in C

^{page 342 note a} PRO foot has Ernulfum

^{page 343 note a} PRO foot has Ernulfum

^{page 344 note a} Everard' C

^{page 344 note b} Westmonasterium C

^{page 345 note a–a} This sentence is clearly corrupt, possibly owing to an omission

^{page 345 note 1} The entry on the Eyre Roll concerns the king's claim against Hugh de Poynz and Henry de Grey, for half the manor of Hoo each, and against the abbot of Reading for the 40 marks rent. The entry in B is a shortened, selective version of this, comprising those parts of the enrolment which relate to the abbot of Reading.

^{page 347 note a} marcas C

^{page 347 note b} Herteypol C

^{page 347 note c} Insert et C (in error)

^{page 347 note 1} The passages included in the Year Books are the same as those in Placita de Quo Warranto.

^{page 347 note 2} In 1293 (Crook, ibid., 176).

^{page 347 note 3} This note appears in C alongside the passage which includes the word hominibus (Placita de Quo Warranto, p. 316Google Scholar, col. 2, last line).

^{page 348 note a} Ms has Maii (see note 1)

^{page 348 note 1} The date given in the text is 11 May, but, in view of the date of the escheator's inquest (no. 449), this must be an error for 11 March.