Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-jswmv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T14:03:22.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X Jean de Paris v. John Huytin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2009

Extract

Among a number of suits arising from grants, this one between Jean de Paris and the Englishman, John Huytin (or Whiting?) went back to a grant of 20 ‘livres’ to be raised from the lordship of Tessancourt, near Mantes, uihich Huytin said had been made to him by the regent. The suit came before the Parlement on appeal by Jean de Pans who claimed that the ‘bailli’ of Mantes, an Englishman, had favoured Huytin ‘quia compatriota’. Paris was to claim the lordship of Tessancourt through his wife, sister and heir to the wife of Jean de Bantalu, the last undisputed lord of Tessancourt. The point at issue (not dissimilar to that raised in the suit between Rose and Handford (no IV) was whether Bantalu had been with the enemy when he died, thereby meriting confiscation, as Huytin argued, or whether he had been loyal, as Jean de Paris, furthering his own claim to Tessancourt, was. to make out.

Information

Type
Texts
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable