Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T10:05:37.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on the Development of Crickets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

A. S. K. Ghouri and
J. E. McFarlane
A. S. K. Ghouri
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Macdonald College, P.Q.
J. E. McFarlane
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Macdonald College, P.Q.
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The house cricket, Acheta domesticus (L.) (Gryllidae, Orthoptera), is a cosmopolitan and easily available insect, and is most suitable as a test animal for physiological research, as has been pointed out by Stone (1953). However, in spite of the long familiarity of entonlologists with this insect it has received very little attention in the literature, no doubt because it has never been of economic importance in Europe or North America. Such quantitative observations on its development as do exist are rather fragmentary (Kemper, 1937; Stone, 1953; Busvine, 1955). The present article describes, in a somewhat more precise way, the rate of development of the nymph of the house cricket at various temperatures and the number and duration of the nymphal stadia, as well as a satisfactory method of rearing the insect and observations on its fecundity.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 90 , Issue 3 , March 1958, pp. 158 - 165
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Blatchley, W. S. 1920. Orthoptera of Northeastern America. Nature Publ. Co., Indianapolis, Ind.Google Scholar
Browning, T. O. 1952. The influence of temperature on the rate of development of insects, with special reference to Gryllulus commodus Walker. Austral. J. Sci. Res., B 5: 96–111.Google ScholarPubMed
Busvine, J. R. 1955. Simple methods for rearing the cricket (Gryllulus domesticus L.) with some observations on the speed of development at different temperatures. Proc. R. Ent. Soc. Lond. 30: 15–18.Google Scholar
Cappe de Baillon, P. 1920. Contributions anatomiques et physiologiques à l'étude de la reproduction chez les Locustiens et les Grilloniens. La Cellule 32: 1–193.Google Scholar
Chopard, L. 1936. Key to the Gryllidae of Ceylon. Ceylon Jour. Set. Sect. B 20: 23.Google Scholar
Ghouri, A. S. K. and Mc FarLane, J. E.. 1958a. Reproductive isolation in the house cricket. Psyche 64: 30–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghouri, A. S. K. and Mc Farlane, J. E.. 1958b. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
Kemper, H. 1937. Beobachtungen über die Biologie der Hausgrille (GryIlus domesticus L.). Z. Hyg. Zool. Schädl Bekampf 29: 69–86. Abstract in Rev. Appl. Ent. (A) 26: 37, 1938.Google Scholar
O'Brien, F. E. M. 1948. The control of humidity by saturated salt solutions, J. Sci. Instrum. 25: 73–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qadri, M. A. H. 1940. On the development of the genitalia and their ducts of Orthopteroid insects. Trans. R. Ent. Soc. Lond., 90: 121–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, P. C. 1953. The house cricket as a laboratory insect. Turtox News 31: 150–151.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. 1950. The principles of insect physiology. Methuen, London.Google Scholar