Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T05:23:42.733Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TIMING SPRAYS FOR CODLING MOTH (LEPIDOPTERA: OLETHREUTIDAE) CONTROL ON APPLE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Elmer A. C. Hagley
Elmer A. C. Hagley
Affiliation:
Research Station, Canada Department of Agriculture, Vineland Station, Ontario
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Effective codling moth control was obtained by timing the application of insecticidesito coincide with the period of greatest larval emergence in the orchard. This occurred 6–10 days after first emergence and the latter could be predicted by heat unit summations. In 1971 and 1972 144 and 137 degree-days accumulated from the date on which the first male moth was taken in pheromone traps and the first larvae emerged, respectively.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 105 , Issue 8 , August 1973, pp. 1085 - 1089
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Batiste, W. C. 1972. Integrated control of codling moth on pears in California — Effects of varying dosage of azinphos-methyl and oil with individual cover sprays. Environ. Ent. 1: 503–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, K. and Terry, H. J.. 1962. Observations on the period and density of oviposition and apple entry by codling moth in relation to timing and application of phosphamidon, ethion and DDT. Proc. British Insecticide and Fungicide Conf. (1961), Vol. 1, pp. 255–265.Google Scholar
Cutright, C. R. 1964. The codling moth in Ohio. Historical and ecological aspects. Res. Bull. Ohio agric. Exp. Stn, No. 969.Google Scholar
Garrett, C. C. 1923. Atmospheric temperatures and the codling moth. Monthly Weather Rev. 51: 128–129.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenn, P. A. 1922. Codling moth investigations of the State Entomologists Office. Bull. Ill. nat. Hist. Surv. 14: 219–289.Google Scholar
Hagley, E. A. C. 1972 a. Observations on codling moth longevity and egg hatchability. Environ. Ent. 1: 123–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagley, E. A. C. 1972 b. Effect of rainfall on the survival and establishment of codling moth larvae. Environ. Ent. 1: 446–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J. A. 1929. Six years' study of the life history and habits of the codling moth (Carpocapsa pomonella L.). A. Rep. ent. Soc. Ont. 59: 96–105.Google Scholar
Howe, R. W. 1967. Temperature effects on embryonic development in insects. A. Rev. Ent. 12: 15–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, L. W. 1943. Codling moth in William's pears. (Investigations in the Goulburn Valley, Vic. 193–1941.) Tech. Bull. Dep. Agric. Vic., No. 1.Google Scholar
Shelford, V. E. 1927. An experimental investigation of the relations of the codling moth to weather and climate. Bull. Ill. nat. Hist. Surv. 16: 311–440.Google Scholar
Webster, R. L. and O'Neill, W. J.. 1942. Time relationship of spring brood codling moth emergence, and subsequent worm entry. J. econ. Ent. 35: 806–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar