Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-7drmj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-04T14:38:54.273Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Topic Islands and the Subjacency Parameter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Michael Rochemont
Michael Rochemont*
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper proposes a formulation of the Subjacency condition and related parametric variation in terms of the notion “barrier” of Chomsky (1986), adapting features of the analysis of Lasnik and Saito (1989). The discussion centers around topic constructions such as (1) and what will be referred to here as the topic island effect, illustrated in (2):

  • (1) Under the table Bill noticed a small iron box.

  • (2)

    • a. *What under the table did Bill notice?

    • b. *I wonder what under the table Bill noticed.

    • c. *The box that under the table Bill noticed was locked.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , June 1989 , pp. 145 - 170
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adams, Marianne 1984 Multiple Interrogation in Italian. The Linguistic Review 4:1–27.Google Scholar
Baltin, Mark 1978 Toward a Theory of Movement Rules. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Baltin, Mark 1982 A Landing Site Theory of Movement Rules. Linguistic Inquiry 13:1–38.Google Scholar
Bowers, John 1976 On Surface Structure Grammatical Relations and the Structure-Preserving Hypothesis. Linguistic Analysis 2:225–242.Google Scholar
Browning, Marguerite 1987 Null Operator Constructions. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1977 On Wh Movement. Pp. 71–132 in Formal Syntax. Culicover, Peter, Wasow, Tom and Akmajian, Adrian, eds. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1981 Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1986 Barriers. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo 1977 The Movement Nature of Left Dislocation. Linguistic Inquiry 8:397–412.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo 1980 On Extraction from NP in Italian. lournal of Italian Linguistics 1-2:47–99.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo 1982 Clitic Left Dislocation in Italian and the ‘Move α’ Parameter. Ms.Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter, and Wilkins, Wendy 1984 Locality in Linguistic Theory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Delahunty, Gerald 1983 But Subject Sentences Do Exist. Linguistic Analysis 12:379–398.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane 1986 Subjacency and the S/S′ Parameter. Linguistic Inquiry 17:364–369.Google Scholar
Gueron, Jacqueline, and May, Robert 1984 Extraposition and Logical Form. Linguistic Inquiry 15:1–31.Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeannette 1974 The Role of Topic and Comment in Linguistic Theory. Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas/Austin.Google Scholar
Higgins, Roger 1973 The Pseudocleft Construction in English. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan, and Thompson, Sandra 1973 On the Applicability of Root Transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4:465–497.Google Scholar
Huang, James 1982 Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Iwakura, Kunihiro 1978 On Root Transformations and the Structure-Preserving Hypothesis. Linguistic Analysis 4:321–364.Google Scholar
Koopman, Hilde 1983 The Syntax of Verbs. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Koster, Jan 1978 Why Subject Sentences Don’t Exist. Pp. 53–64 in Recent Transformational Studies in European Languages. Keyser, S.J., ed. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard 1988 On the Double Object Construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19:335–391.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard, and Saito, Mamoru 1984 On the Nature of Proper Government. Linguistic Inquiry 15:235–290.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard, and Saito, Mamoru 1989 Move α. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. [Forthcoming.]Google Scholar
Longobardi, G. 1987 Extraction from NP and the Proper Notion of Head Government. Ms.Google Scholar
Massam, Diane 1985 Case Theory and the Projection Principle. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick 1987 Presentational there-Insertion and the Notions ‘Root Transformation-’ and ‘Stylistic Rule’. In Papers from the 23rd Regional Meeting. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi 1982 Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochemont, Michael 1978 A Theory of Stylistic Rules in English. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts/Amherst.Google Scholar
Rochemont, Michael, and Culicover, Peter 1989 English Focus Constructions and the Theory of Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [In press.]Google Scholar
Saito, Mamoru 1985 Some Asymmetries in Japanese and Their Theoretical Consequences. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Sportiche, Dominique 1981 Bounding Nodes in French. The Linguistic Review 1:219–246.Google Scholar
Vinet, Marie-Thérèse 1987 Des constructions IP adjointes sur la gauche. Ms.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin 1974 Rule Ordering in Syntax. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.Google Scholar