Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T14:31:33.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Matrix Commutators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Marvin Marcus and
Nisar A. Khan
Marvin Marcus
Affiliation:
The University of British Columbia and Muslim University, Aligarh
Nisar A. Khan
Affiliation:
The University of British Columbia and Muslim University, Aligarh
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Let A, B, and X be n-square matrices over an algebraically closed field F of characteristic 0. Let [A, B] = AB — BA and set (A, B) = [A, [A, B]]. Recently several proofs (1; 3; 5) of the following result have appeared: if det (AB) ≠ 0 and (A,B) = 0 then A-1B-1AB - I is nilpotent. In (2) McCoy determined the general form of any X satisfying

1.1

in the case that A has a single elementary divisor corresponding to each eigenvalue, that is, A is non-derogatory. In Theorem 1 we determine the structure of any matrix X satisfying (1.1) and also give a formula for the dimension of the linear space of all such X in terms of the degrees of the elementary divisors of A.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 12 , 1960, pp. 269 - 277
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1960

References

1. Herstein, I.N., On a theorem of Putnam and Wintner, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc, 9 (1958), 363–364.Google Scholar
2. McCoy, N.H., On quasi-commutative matrices, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc, 36 (1934), 327–340.Google Scholar
3. Putnam, C.R. and Wintner, A., On the spectra of group commutators, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc, 9 (1958), 360–362.Google Scholar
4. Roth, W.E., On k-commutative matrices, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc, 39 (1936), 483–495.Google Scholar
5. Taussky, O., A note on the group commutator of A and A*, J. Wash. Acad. Sci., 48 (1958), 305.Google Scholar
6. Turnbull, H.W. and Aitken, A.C., An introduction to the theory of canonical matrices (London, 1932).Google Scholar
7. Wedderburn, J.H.M., Lectures on matrices, Amer. Math. Soc Colloq. Publ. 17 (New York, 1934).Google Scholar