Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T09:09:05.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Uniformities on a Product

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Anthony W. Hager
Anthony W. Hager*
Affiliation:
Wesley an University, Middleton, Connecticut
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

All topological spaces shall be uniformizable (completely regular Hausdorff). A uniformity on X shall be viewed as a collection μ of coverings of X, via the manner of Tukey [20] and Isbell [16], and the associated uniform space denoted μX. Given the uniformizable topological space X, we shall be concerned with compatible uniformities as follows (discussed more carefully in § 1). The fine uniformity α (finest compatible with the topology); the “cardinal reflections“ αm of α (m an infinite cardinal number) ; αc, the weak uniformity generated by the real-valued continuous functions.

With μ standing, generically, for one of these uniformities, we consider the question: when is μ(X × Y) = μX × μY For μ = αℵ0 (the finest compatible precompact uniformity), the problem is equivalent to that of when

β(X × Y) = βX × βY,

β denoting Stone-Cech compactification; this is answered by the theorem of Glicksberg [9]. For μ = α, we have Isbell's generalization [16, VI1.32].

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , June 1972, pp. 379 - 389
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1972

References

1. Comfort, W. W., On the Hewitt realcompactification of a product space, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 131 (1968), 107–118.Google Scholar
2. Comfort, W. W. and Anthony Hager, W., The projection and other continuous mappings on a product space, Math. Scand. 28 (1971), 77–90.Google Scholar
3. Comfort, W. W. and Stelios Negrepontis, Extending continuous functions on X × Y to subsets of βX × βY, Fund. Math. 59 (1966), 1–12.Google Scholar
4. Corson, H. H. and Isbell, J. R., Euclidean covers of topological spaces, Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. 11 (1960), 34–42.Google Scholar
5. Engelking, R., Outline of General Topology (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1968),Google Scholar
6. Gantner, T. E., Extensions of uniformly continuous pseudometrics, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 132 (1968), 147–157.Google Scholar
7. Gillman, L. and Jerison, M., Rings of continuous functions (Van Nostrand, Princeton, 1960).Google Scholar
8. Ginsberg, S. and Isbell, J. R., Some operators on uniform spaces, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 93 (1959), 145–168.Google Scholar
9. Glicksberg, I., Stone-Čech compactifications of products, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 90 (1959), 369–382.Google Scholar
10. Anthony W., Hager, Projections of zero-sets (and the fine uniformity on a product), Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 140 (1969), 87–94.Google Scholar
11. Anthony W., Hager, On inverse-closed subalgebras of C(X), Proc. London Math. Soc. 19 (1969), 233–257.Google Scholar
12. Hewitt, E., Rings of real-valued continuous functions. I, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.Google Scholar
13. Miroslav, Husek, The Hewitt realcompactification of a product, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolinae 11 (1970), 393–395.Google Scholar
14. Miroslav, Husek, Pseudo-m-compactness and v[P × Q) (to appear in Indag. Math.).Google Scholar
15. Miroslav, Husek, Realcompactness of function spaces and v(P × Q) (to appear in Indag. Math.).Google Scholar
16. Isbell, J. R., Uniform spaces, Math. Surveys No. 12 (Amer. Math. Soc, Providence, 1964).Google Scholar
17. Noble, Norman, Products with closed projections, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 140 (1969).Google Scholar
18. Onuchic, Nelson, On the Nachbin uniform structure, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 11 (1960), 177-179.Google Scholar
19. Shirota, Taira, A class of topological spaces, Osaka Math. J. 1 (1952), 20-40.Google Scholar
20. Tukey, J. W., Convergence and uniformity in topology, Annals of Math. Studies, No. 2 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1940).Google Scholar
21. Vidossich, G., A note on cardinal reflections in the category of uniform spaces, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 23 (1969), 53-58.Google Scholar