Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T17:01:50.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Group Home Care: — an inside view

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2024

Lesley Oakley
Lesley Oakley*
Affiliation:
The Victorian Children’s Aid Society, Black Rock, Victoria
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Every child is entitled to share in, and be part of family life. Where the child’s natural family is unable to offer that family experience society is obligated to provide a substitute family. Family group home care should not be regarded as substitute family care. However, if agencies conducting family group home programmes are aware of the limitations of this model, the positive aspects of family group home care may be optimised.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Children Australia , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , Winter 1984, pp. 6 - 9
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Ainsworth, F., “Emergent Perspectives In Child Care”, Australian Child & Family Welfare, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 3 – 8.Google Scholar
2. Ainsworth, F. & Fulcher, L. (eds) “Group Care for Children”, Tavistock Publications London, 1981.Google Scholar
3. Beedell, C., “Residential Life With Children”, Routledge & Kegan Pane, London, 1970.Google Scholar
4. Central Council for Education & Training in Social Work, “Training for Residential Work”, U.K., 1973.Google Scholar
5. Child Welfare League of America, “Group care of children. Crossroads and transitions”. New York, 1978.Google Scholar
6. Department Community Welfare Services, “Draft Principles of Scattered Family Group Home Units” — adapted from Supervisor’s Manual, Melbourne.Google Scholar
7. Department Community Welfare Services, “Review of the Family Group Home Programs Operating in Victoria”, Victoria, 1981.Google Scholar
8. Gregory, G. & Smith, N., “Particular Care”, Children’s Bureau of Australia, Victoria, 1982.Google Scholar
9. Maloney, D. et al, “BIABH Prospect: Regional Adaptation of the Teaching-Family Model Group Home for Adolescents, Child Welfare, Vol. LVI, No. 1, January 1977, pp. 787 – 796.Google Scholar
10. Pederick, H., “Profiles of a Sample of Children in Long Term Family Group Home Care,” Glastonbury Children’s Home, Geelong, 1983.Google Scholar
11. Pringle, M. (ed) “Caring for Children”, Longman, London, 1970.Google Scholar
12. Residential Child Care Advisory Committee, “Residential Child Care Manual of Practice,” Adelaide, 1978.Google Scholar
13. Whittaker, J.K., “The Changing Character of Residential Child Care: An Ecological Perspective”. Social Service Review, March 1978, pp. 21 – 36. New South Wales Department of Youth & Community Services, Annual Report, Part 1 & 2, 1980 – 81. Queensland Department of Children’s Services — Annual Report ana Statistical Supplement 1983. South Australian Department for Community Welfare Annual Report 1982 – 83, Victorian Department of Community Welfare Service Annual Report 1982 – 83. Western Australian Department for Community Welfare Annual Report 1982 – 83.Google Scholar