Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T02:01:13.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modern Interpretations of Nestorius

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Carl E. Braaten
Carl E. Braaten
Affiliation:
Lutheran School of Theology, Maywood, Ill.
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Nestorius continues to be a problem for modern historians of doctrine. The Problem arose in the fifth century when the church acting at the Council of Ephesus (431 A.D.) anathematized Nestorius, the Bishop of Constantinople, and pronounced Nestorianism a christological heresy. The decisions of the Council of Ephesus were accepted and re-affirmed at the Fourth (451 A.D.) and Fifth (553 A.D.) Ecumenical Councils. It must be said that “Nestorianism” as a special kind of doctrine could have been condemned as heretical could be called “dyoprosopatism.” But such was not the case. Nestorius was condemned and exiled as a heretic, and he was judged on the basis of certain doctrines which he was accused of holding. From the moment of his excommunication until the present time there have been many expressions of uncertainty as to whether he really taught and believed what was defined and condemned as Nestorianism. Somewhat epigrammatically historians have been asking whether Nestorius himself was a Nestorian.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , September 1963, pp. 251 - 267
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bedjan, Paul (ed.), Nestorius: Le Livers d'Heraclide de Damas (Paris, 1910).Google Scholar
Bethune-Baker, J. F., An Introduction to the Early History of Christian Doctrine (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1903).Google Scholar
Bethune-Baker, J. F., Nestorius and His Teaching (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1908).Google Scholar
Cave, Sydney, The Doctrine of the Person of Christ (London: Duckworth, 1925).Google Scholar
Concordia Triglotta, German, Latin, English. The Symbolical Books of the Evangelical Lutheran Church (Minneapolis: The Mott Press, 1955).Google Scholar
Driver, G. R., and Hodgson, L., Nestorius: The Bazaar of Heracleides, Newly translated from the Syrian and edited with an introduction, notes, and appendices (Oxford: Clareadon Press, 1925).Google Scholar
Duschesne, Msgr. Louis, The Early History of the Christian Church, trans. Jenkins, Claude (London: John Murray, 1924), Vol. III.Google Scholar
Fendt, L., Die Christologie des Nestorius (Universität zu Strassburg, 1910).Google Scholar
Harnack, A. von, History of Dogma, trans. Speirs, and Miller, (London: Williams and Norgate, 1898), Vol. IV.Google Scholar
Hayes, E. R., L'Ecole d'Edesse (Paris: Les Presses Modernes, 1930).Google Scholar
Headlam, A. C., “Nestorius and Orthodoxy,” Church Quarterly Review, LXXX, No. 60 (07, 1915).Google Scholar
Jugie, M., Nestorius et la Controverse Nestorienne (Paris: Gabriel Beauchesne, 1912).Google Scholar
Kidd, B. J., A History of the Church to A. D. 461 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1922).Google Scholar
Loofs, F., Nestoriana, Die Fragments des Nestorius (Halle: Niemeyer, 1905).Google Scholar
Loofs, F., Nestorius and His Place in the History of Christian Doctrine (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1914).Google Scholar
Mackintosh, H. R., The Doctrine of the Persons of Jesus Christ (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1912).Google Scholar
F., Nan, (trans.) Nestorius: Le Livre d'Heraclide de Damas (Paris: Letouzey et Ane, 1910).Google Scholar
Relton, N. M., A Study in Christology (London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, 1917).Google Scholar
Relton, N. M., “Nestorius the Nestorian,” Church Quarterly Review, LXXII, No. 146 (01, 1912).Google Scholar
Rowe, J. B., “Nestorius,” Thesis, Washburn Prize (Harvard University, 1945).Google Scholar
Seeberg, R., History of Doctrines, trans. Hay, Charles (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1954), Vols. I, II.Google Scholar
Sellers, R. V., Two Ancient Christologies (London: S.P.C.K., 1954).Google Scholar
Socrates, , Ecclesiastical History, in Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, edited by Schaff, Philip and Wace, Henry (2nd. series; New York: The Christian Literature Co., 1890), Vol. II.Google Scholar
Tixeront, J., Histoire des Dogmes (Second ed.; Paris: V. Lecoffre 1906–1912), Vol. III.Google Scholar
Vine, A. R., An Approach to Christology (London: Independent Press, 1948).Google Scholar
Wolfson, H. A., The Philosophy of the Church Fathers (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1956), Vol. I.Google Scholar