^{page 209 note 2} Renou, L., Grammaire de la Langue Védique §§ 85–96.Google Scholar

^{page 209 note 3} Whitney, , Skt. Grammar, § 366.Google Scholar

^{page 210 note 1} Cf. RV. vii 88. I—a yet more striking case covering tristubh verses a-b.Google Scholar

^{page 210 note 2} On the greater prevalence of tmesis in early Latin: Servius in Aeneid. i. 412.

^{page 210 note 3} On old Irish pronouns: see Lewis, and Pedersen, , Concise Comp. Celt. Grammar, § 336.Google Scholar

^{page 210 note 4} The Praeneste fibula offends de Groot's rule: (third word) MANIOS: MED: FHE: FHAKED: NUMASIOI. But see Revue des Études Latines xii (1934), 119 for his views at length.Google Scholar

^{page 212 note 1} Lindsay, W. M., Early Latin Verse, 1922.Google Scholar

^{page 212 note 2} C.R. lxxiii, N.S. ix (1959). 45.Google Scholar

^{page 212 note 3} Text follows Ernout: normalized in triads (2), (3), (4) as repetition assumed.

^{page 213 note 1} Koster, W. J. W., ‘Versus Saturnius’, Mnemosyne lvii (1929), 267–346.Google Scholar

^{page 213 note 2} Ibid., 316.

^{page 214 note 1} p. 211.

^{page 216 note 1} Op. cit., pp. 318–19.Google Scholar

^{page 216 note 2} de Groot, A. W., Revue des Études Latines, xii (1934), 312.Google Scholar

^{page 216 note 3} Bericht, S.. Münch. Akad., 1892, pp. 188–219.Google Scholar

^{page 216 note 4} p. 213 above.

^{page 217 note 1} p. 210 above.

^{page 217 note 2} op. cit., p. 131.Google Scholar

^{page 218 note 1} Where vowels e/i/u are treated as consonantal they will lengthen the foregoing syllable, whose vowel is therefore marked long.

^{page 219 note 1} Prepositional phrases and other grammatical combinations with monosyllables preceding or following a longer word tended to be treated as word-groups.

^{page 220 note 1} Cato, , de agri cultura, c.Google Scholar 132—quoted in Müller, , Handbuch der klassischen Altertums wissenschaft, ii. 577.Google Scholar

^{page 220 note 2} Cato, , op. cit., c. 160.Google Scholar

^{page 221 note 1} Whatmough, J., A.J.P. lviii (1937), 483 ff.Google Scholar

^{page 221 note 2} We might also scan the first colon on strict initial word stress rules as VAR:

The division of would then be a device to move its accent off the first syllable.

^{page 222 note 1} Loc. cit.

^{page 225 note 1} However, the same facts lead Pasquali to the opposite conclusion that Saturnian verse must be quantitative!

^{page 226 note 1} Suetonius, , Divus Iulius, 49.Google Scholar

^{page 226 note 2} Lucretius, , de Rerum Natura 1. 150.Google Scholar

^{page 226 note 3} Ernout, Alfred, Recueil de Textes Latins Archaiques, Paris, Klincksieck, 1947.Google Scholar

^{page 226 note 4} Cf. above, pp. 223–4.

^{page 229 note 1} Cf. above, p. 228.

^{page 232 note 1} Elision of an initial monosyllable would be foreign to stress trochaic verse.

^{page 234 note 1} Mariotti, S., Livio Andronico e la traduzione artistica (Urbino, 1952), pp. 72–91.Google Scholar

^{page 234 note 2} Warmington, E. H., Remains of Old Latin, vol. ii. 26 (Loeb).Google Scholar

^{page 236 note 1} We should not press this too far. Non-epic need not mean non-Satumian (cf. p. 230).

^{page 238 note 1} By this term the writer means poetry written before the total victory of the Greek quantitative verse principle in the hands of Ennius.

^{page 238 note 2} This sentence was written in 1959.