^{page 184 note 2} Genethliakon Wilhelm Schtnid, 1929 (Tübinger Beitrage 5), pp. 200–464.Google Scholar

^{page 184 note 3} Kroll, J.Kroll, J., Gott und Hölle (1932), p. 481, n. 3.Google Scholar

^{page 184 note 4} Homer, , Epigr. xv–xviGoogle Scholar, Evelyn-White; Edmonds, , Lyra Graeca iii. 522 ff.Google Scholar

^{page 185 note 1} Cf. Eur. Bacch. 419Google ScholarCresphontes fr. 453. I (cf.Ar.fr. 109 Edmonds) Page, Poet. met. gr. 1021 = Pindarfr. 263 Turyn Philemon fr. 71 Edmonds, , Orph. H. 32. 15, 64.Google Scholar 9. Other examples are given by Dodds on Eur. Bacch.; Mannhardt, W., Wald-und Feldkulte², ii. 245 and n. 3Google Scholar; Keyssner, K., Gottesvorstellung und Lebensauffassung im griechischen Hymnus (1932), pp. 139–47.Google Scholar For Euphrosyne in this company see Keyssner, , pp. 151 f.Google Scholar

^{page 185 note 2} Cf. Newiger, H.–J., Metapher und Allegoric (1957), p. 47.Google Scholar

^{page 185 note 3} Agnostos Theos, pp. 143 ff. (p. 148 for descende).Google Scholar

^{page 185 note 4} Horace, pp. 212 f.Google Scholar

^{page 185 note 5} T.A.Ph.A. lxxxviii (1957), 63.Google Scholar

^{page 185 note 6} Die Ilias und Homer, p. 416.Google Scholar

^{page 186 note 1} Ap. Athen. Deipn. 359 f.Google Scholar = fr. 2 Powell, (Coll. Alex., p. 233)Google Scholar, Knox, A. D., Diehl, (Anth. Lyr. iii. 126 f.).Google Scholar

^{page 186 note 2} Cf. Lesley, A., Thalatta (1947), p. 262.Google Scholar

^{page 186 note 3} Cf. Eisele, , Roscher's Lex. iii, 2. 2574. 43 ff.Google Scholar; Zwicker, , RE xxi. 1 (1951), 1032. 5–9.Google Scholar

^{page 186 note 4} Carm. pop. 2 Diehl, (Anth. lyr. ii, p. 193).Google Scholar

^{page 187 note 1} The non-connective use of which ‘signifies, vividly and dramatically, that something is actually taking place at the moment’ (Denniston, , Greek Particles2, p. 250Google Scholar). Here it would also approximate to ‘already’ (cf.Ibid., p. 252). In defence of the emendation it is perhaps worth noting that the other three occurrences of ) in the poem (ll. I, 5, 50Google Scholar) are datives and all lack the article. At the moment I can find no better parallel for than Reiske's problematical at Eur. Andr. 334Google Scholar (cf. Denniston, , op. cit., p. 583).Google Scholar Corruption occurs in the opposite direction in Hesych. s.v.

^{page 187 note 2} I postulate an early date for Hymn 2 (c. 273/2). The usual date (c. 250–247) would make this conclusion more obvious.

^{page 187 note 3} Cf. Nilsson, , Gr. Rel., i. 530Google Scholar; Gr. Feste, pp. 105, 116–18.Google ScholarDeubner, , Attische Feste, pp. 191 f., 198–201 discounts the evidence connecting the eiresione also with the Thar-gelia.Google Scholar

^{page 187 note 4} Die Mas und Homer, p. 434 n.Google Scholar

^{page 187 note 5} So Gulick. A. D. Knox: ‘Apollo's child’.

^{page 187 note 6} Ael. Nat. Anim. I. 47, 48Google Scholar; Bianor, , Anth. Pal. 9. 272.Google Scholar

^{page 187 note 7} Wien. Stud, liv (1936), 145, n. 9. He may intend his unguarded language to refer solely to the apostrophe to the doors.Google Scholar

^{page 187 note 8} ‘Ein neues Tiirwunder’, Rh. Mus. lxxxiii (1940), 152–7. I am grateful to Prof. Herter for enabling me to see his article.Google Scholar

^{page 188 note 1} Theocritus, ii. 415.Google Scholar Gow knows Herter's paper, but I am not aware that he ever discussed it in print. At the time of his remarks in C. Q. xxxvi (1942), 107 ff., its unavailability is understandable.Google Scholar

^{page 188 note 2} Herm. lxxiv (1939), 58–65.Google Scholar

^{page 188 note 3} A reference to Kall. H. 2 follows.Google Scholar

^{page 189 note 1} Cf. H. H. Dem. 448 f.Google Scholar, Hipponax fr. 29 Diehl, (fr. 36 Masson)Google Scholar, Ar. Plut. passim. Hesiod, , Theog. 969 ff., gives Ploutos an inter national mission.Google Scholar

^{page 189 note 2} Rh. Mus. xcv (1952), 312–27.Google Scholar

^{page 189 note 3} Philol. ci (1957), 8.Google Scholar

^{page 189 note 4} C.Q. N.S. xiii (1963), 51 f.Google Scholar

^{page 189 note 5} In view of the uncertain metrical pattern it would be unwise to lay emphasis on the adverbial function of (restored by Lobel- Page for ).

^{page 189 note 6} Cf. Verdenius, , Mnem. Ser. iv. ii (1949), 294–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pfister, , RE Suppl. iv (1924), 314. 24 ff. (note the frequency with which ‘super human’ appears in Pfister's epiphany examples).Google Scholar

^{page 189 note 7} See Svennung, J., Catulls Bildersprache, pp. 61 f.Google Scholar

^{page 190 note 1} Merkelbach, for example, recalls it in his article on Sappho fr. III (see above).

^{page 190 note 2} Unfortunately Küchler's De vestigiis non-nullis Veteris Testamenti quae in hymnis Calli-machi deprehenduntur (Neostadium ad Orlam, 1788) is not available to me.

^{page 190 note 3} Poems of Callimachus (London 1931), pp. 28 f.Google Scholar

^{page 190 note 4} Vetus Testamentum x (1960), 428–34.Google Scholar

^{page 190 note 5} Kleinknecht, , Die Gebetsparodie in der Antike (1937), p. 38.Google Scholar He cites the familiar Eur. Bacch. 68 ff.Google Scholar and Ar. Ran. 354 ff.Google Scholar

^{page 190 note 6} Cf. Coppens, J.ap. The Sacral Kingship (Studies in the History of Religions iv, Leiden, 1959), p. 343.Google Scholar

^{page 190 note 7} Spanheim ad H. 2. 29Google Scholar already shows a sound approach: ‘Unde conjiciendi foret locus, hausisse id forte Callimachum sub Ptolemaeis et quidem Alexandriae …. e lectione veteris Foederis in Graecam turn linguam ibi a Senioribus conversi…; nisi quod non Apollini quidem, sed Minervae idem plane tribuerat dudum ante Pindarus.’

^{page 190 note 8} I am not forgetting the problem of whether viv is the honorand's father or the commandment or victory (line 17: this last solution has been supported by Burton, R. W. B., Pindar's Pythian Odes [1962], pp. 20f.). Even if Xenokrates is protecting viv by the station at a warrior's right hand, the idea of honour is not excluded.Google Scholar

^{page 191 note 1} Vet. Test. xv. 85–90.Google Scholar

^{page 191 note 2} Ps. 110. 4: ‘The Lord hath sworn, and will not repent…’.

^{page 191 note 3} Donwn natalicium Schrijnen (1929), pp. 803–4.Google Scholar

^{page 191 note 4} Genethliakon Wilhelm Schmid (1929), pp. 231, n. 4, 415 ff., 438 f.Google Scholar

^{page 191 note 5} Gott und Hölle (1932), pp. 46 f., 196, 348.Google Scholar

^{page 191 note 6} Op. cit., p. 417 (cf. 270, n. 28,400 f., 414).Google Scholar

^{page 191 note 7} Weinreich, , op. cit., pp. 251 f., itemizes the parallels with Kallimachos.Google Scholar

^{page 191 note 8} Cf. Ernout, A., Stud. ltd. Fil. Class. xxvii/xxviii (1956), 120 ff.Google Scholar

^{page 191 note 9} Te 51 … tibi 52 … te 54 … tu 56; sine te 61 … sine te 66; quis huic deo / compararier ausit? 64/65, 69/70, 74/75. Cf. Norden, E., Agnostos Theos, pp. 143–63 (esp. 157, n. 3), 349–50Google Scholar; Keyssner, K., Gottesvorstellung und Lebensauffassung im griechischen Hymnus (1932), p. 29.Google Scholar

^{page 191 note 10} Cf. Wheeler, A. L., A.J.Ph. li (1930), 217–22.Google Scholar On p. 218 he draws attention to the recommendations of the rhetoricians, e.g. Menander, (Spengel, , Rhetores Graeci iii. 405 ff.Google Scholar), who advises the orator to ‘exhort the groom and bride’, ‘utter the prayer’, ‘exhort the youths’, ‘summon the hearers … to escort the pair to the wedding chamber'. See also Wheeler, Catullus and the Traditions of Ancient Poetry (Univ. of California Press, 1934), pp. 183–217, esp. 200 ff.

^{page 192 note 1} Ap. Athen. xiv. 622bGoogle Scholar (Page, Poet. mel. gr., no. 851a).Google Scholar Cf. Ar. Thesm. 39 ff.Google Scholar, Meso-medes, , Hymn 2. 1 ff.Google Scholar (Heitsch, , Die gr. Dichter-fragmente der röm. Kaiserzeit i. 25)Google Scholar, Eur. Bacch. 69 ff. (cf. 600 ff.).Google ScholarPindar, , Partheneia 2. 3 ff. (fr. 94b, Snell) is probably similar.Google Scholar

^{page 192 note 2} Asyndeton is common with this con struction in Latin (cf. Ov. Rem. Am. 705 f.Google Scholar Phoebus adest; sonuere lyrae, sonuere pharetrae), perhaps partly because no causal particle with both the metrical advantage and mobility of developed. But it also occurs in Greek, : Kail. H. 5. 1–3Google Scholar, Corp. Herm. xiii. 17 (ii, p. 208, Nock). Cf. Sappho, fr. III.Google Scholar

^{page 192 note 3} See the commentaries, also Wilamowitz, , Hell. Dicht. ii. 283, n. 2.Google Scholar

^{page 192 note 4} That is to say, virgo would suit the epiphany of divinities like Minerva, Diana, or Vesta.

^{page 192 note 5} Cf. among others Friedrich, G., Catiulli Veronensis Liber (1908), p. 269. He cites Ovid, Met. to. 6 f. (on the ill-omened marriage of Orpheus and Eurydice): Fax quoque, quam tenuit (sc. Hymenaeus), lacrimoso stridula fumo / usque fuit nullosque inuenit motibus ignes.Google Scholar

^{page 193 note 1} Whence the descriptions in Ovid, , Met. 15. 634 f.Google Scholar, Verg. Aen. 3. 90 f.Google Scholar, and Lucan, , Phars. 5. 154 f.Google Scholar (all involving Apollo). Cf. Ovid, , Met. 4. 486, 9. 782 ff.Google Scholar; Ogle, M. B., A.J.Ph. xxxii (1911), 270, n. 2.Google Scholar

^{page 193 note 2} For example Soph. Ant. 1147Google Scholar, Meso-medes, , H. 2. 17 f.Google Scholar

^{page 193 note 3} Cf. Pfister, , RE Suppl. iv (1924), 315. 10 ff.Google Scholar

^{page 193 note 4} Dr. Joan Haldane reminds me that the epiphany theme occurs in a wedding con text in Ar. Aves 1706–19.Google Scholar Cf. Kleinknecht, , A.f. Rw. xxxiv (1937), 294 ff.Google Scholar

^{page 193 note 5} J.R.S. xlv (1955). n. 22.Google Scholar

^{page 194 note 1} P. Oxy. 2258 fr. 2Google Scholar, Schol. Theokr. II. 12.Google Scholar