^{page 216 note 1} Recueil des inscriptions juridiques grecques (1891–1895), p. 421;Google ScholarKohler-Ziebarth, , Das Stadtrecht von Gortyn, p. 44;Google ScholarBusolt, , Griechische Staatskunde, p. 487,Google Scholar n. 2; Larsen, , ‘Periocci in Crete’, Class. Phil. xxxi. 19.Google Scholar

^{page 216 note 2} Inscriptiones Creticae, vol. iv, Nos. 14 g–p, 30, 53 a, 72 xi, 78, 79, 89?, 144.

^{page 216 note 3} Ibid. 78. About mid-fifth-century B.C.

^{page 216 note 4} See the discussion by M. Guarducci, I.C., loc. cit.

^{page 216 note 6} Ibid. 72 1.

^{page 216 note 7} Recueil, pp. 420–1, 492–3; Guarducci, , I.C. iv, p. 181.Google Scholar

^{page 216 note 8} Ap. Athenaeus 143 c–f.

^{page 216 note 9} Laws 850.

^{page 216 note 10} Ibid. 952.

^{page 216 note 11} Pol. 1260 ^a 37. Cf. 1267 ^b 15, 1277 ^b 1, 1278 ^a 17, 1291 ^a 1, 1319 ^a 26, 1326 ^a 22, 1328 ^b 39, 1329 ^a 19, 1331 ^a 33.

^{page 216 note 12} I.C. iv. 58Google Scholar and Guarducci ad loc.

^{page 216 note 13} Ibid. 79.

^{page 216 note 14} Guarducci ad loc.

^{page 217 note 1} I.C. iv, 144.Google Scholar

^{page 217 note 2} I.C. ii. v. 1.Google Scholar

^{page 217 note 3} Ibid. xii. 9.

^{page 217 note 4} So Guarducci ad loc.

^{page 217 note 5} iniuria supplevi, contra Comparetti et Blass qui apte restituerant’: Guarducci ad I.C. iv. 79,Google Scholar lines 10 f. But if my argument is correct, the case for is strong.

^{page 217 note 6} ’Between Slavery and Freedom’, American Historical Review, vol. L, No. 2, pp. 213–27.Google Scholar

^{page 217 note 7} Ibid., p. 217.

^{page 217 note 8} Ibid., p. 218.

^{page 218 note 1} On the derivation of the name from a temple of the goddess, see Recueil, p. 492, and Guarducci, , I.C. iv. 78.Google Scholar

^{page 218 note 2} Laws 915.

^{page 218 note 3} Westermann, , op. cit., p. 221.Google Scholar

^{page 218 note 4} Ibid., p. 222.

^{page 219 note 1} i.e. metics; see Laws 850.

^{page 219 note 2} I.C. iv. 231–6.Google Scholar (Another, I.C. i. xxxv. 4,Google Scholar there attributed to Pylorus ?, of about the first century A.D., is now considered by Guarducci to be perhaps Gortynian, of the second or third century B.C.)

^{page 219 note 3} i.e. 231, 233, and perhaps 236.

^{page 219 note 4} The opinion of De Sanctis, followed by Guarducci.

^{page 219 note 5} i.e. 234 and 235.

^{page 219 note 6} Guarducci, , I.C. iv, p. 181.Google Scholar