Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T08:36:23.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Note on Horace and Pindar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

C. W. Whitaker
Affiliation:
University of Southampton

Extract

Although not tenable in details, Porphyrion's interpretation seems to me generally preferable to Bentley's, despite the very wide acceptance of the latter. Horace is in all seriousness defending his claim to originality. On the Bentleian interpretation, it is a curious defence that he is made to offer:

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable