No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 February 2009

page 128 note 1 I lament that he adds acad. II 38 ‘necesse est lancem in libra ponderibus impositis deprimi’, where the verb has its normal sense: he should have left this confusion to J. S. Reid ad loc. and the thes. ling. Lat. V p. 612 74 f., where there is no mention or recognition of the peculiar use.
page 129 note 1 longe Baehrens, Vollmer; longa Postgate, Curcio; Mr Enk has longe in his text and longa in his note.