^{page 99 note 1} See our Preface to Books I.-V., p. vi footnote.

^{page 99 note 2} See Addendum I. on p. 104.

^{page 99 note 3} Where the b commonly appears with a very small upper half.

^{page 100 note 1} On the character of the digression in ce. 18, 19, see App. II. in Prof. Anderson's edition. Our own study confirms his conclusion.

^{page 100 note 2} The confusion of -is and -es in any part of the third declension needs no illustration.

^{page 100 note 3} Or as we read motu pulveris se.

^{page 101 note 1} See Addendum II. on p. 104.

^{page 101 note 2} See Addendum III. on p. 104.

^{page 102 note 1} See Addendum IV. on p. 105.

^{page 102 note 2} There is an exception in 37. 59. 1.

^{page 102 note 3} See Addendum V. on p. 105.

^{page 103 note 1} Probus also (ib. IV. 129) quotes the phrase, but ascribes it to Lucilius or Vergil. It is not in Vergil; if it came from Lucilius, L. Mueller's aurata for inaurata wouldbe plausible.

^{page 103 note 2} Sed maxime equitum facies oculos in se conuertit.