Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-th4rj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T19:24:12.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Archaisms in the Troizen Decree

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

James J. Kennelly
James J. Kennelly
Affiliation:
Brown University
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The decree of Themistocles, discovered by M. H. Jameson and first published by him in 1960 has given rise to an intense debate centring on the question of the decree's authenticity. This debate has focused to an important extent on supposed archaisms or anachronisms in the text. If a word appears to be used in an ‘archaic’ manner, i.e., in this instance, one peculiar to the early fifth century, it may be an indication of the inscription's authenticity. Conversely, a word employed in a manner proper to a later time may be an indication of the decree's actual period of origination. Thus an early and influential commentator, D. M. Lewis, argued for the decree's authenticity asserting: ‘I see no reason to suspect a forgery. There are too many traces of official and archaic language.’.

Information

Type
Shorter Notes
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , December 1990, pp. 539 - 541
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 Hesperia 29 (1960), 198–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar. A summary of the early stages of the debate is provided by Chambers, M. H. in Philologus 111 (1967), 166–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 CQn.s. 11 (1961), 61–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Meiggs, R. and Lewis, D. M., Greek Historical Inscriptions (Oxford, 1969), p. 52Google Scholar.

4 Op. cit., p. 62.

5 Termini for the speech are provided by a reference to the battle of Chaeronea in 338 (26.11) and by Dinarchus' knowledge of the trial of Aristogeiton in a speech of 324 B.C. (2.13).

6 The decree's first appearance is at Dem. 19.303.

7 Lewis, , op. cit., p. 62Google Scholar.

8 Harrison, A. R. W., The Law of Athens (Oxford, 1968), p. 188Google Scholar.

9 Lectures in Memory of Louise Taft Semple, 1st Series (Princeton, 1967), pp. 119–32Google Scholar.