^{page 60 note 1} Meritt, B. D., The Athenian Calendar in the Fifth Century (1928), p. 29Google Scholar; ‘below line 75 there were never more than 74 letter spaces, though sometimes less, in each line. In this lower part of the inscription, especially from line 94 on, the Stoichedon order of letters and numerals, especially numerals, is often neglected.’ See also the text as given by the same author in Athenian Financial Documents (1932), pp. 136–43.

^{page 60 note 2} Tod, M. N., Greek Historical Inscriptions, no. 64Google Scholar.

^{page 60 note 3} The disposition can best be studied in the drawing published by Meritt, , The Athenian Calendar, Plate IGoogle Scholar.

^{page 60 note 4} There is a misprint in the text of Meritt, , Ath. Fin. Doc., p. 142Google Scholar, line 104: the line should begin [οις ηεχσέκοντα…].

^{page 60 note 5} For Ἀθεναία[ς τς Νίκες-] see τ⋯[ς Νίκης Ἀ]θηναίας of IG. i². 298. lines 20–1. The text is given in Meritt, , Ath. Fin. Doc., p. 93Google Scholar.

^{page 61 note 1} See Tod, op. cit., note on p. 142.

^{page 61 note 2} Tod, op. cit., no. 64.

^{page 61 note 3} Dodwell, Edward, A Classical and Topographical Tour through Greece, i (1819), p. 372Google Scholar.

^{page 62 note 1} Cf. Meritt, , Ath. Fin. Doc., p. 135Google Scholar.

^{page 62 note 2} A photograph of Gell's copy is given by Meritt, , op. cit., p. 137Google Scholar.Tod, op. cit., no. 64, has the correct reading in line 113, but he must have used the old reading in computing the total in lines 117–18.

^{page 62 note 3} The lines are numbered as by Tod, op. cit.

^{page 63 note 1} For a possible restoration of this number, see below.

^{page 63 note 2} The line may also be restored [κεϕάλαιον χρέμασιν Ἀθεναίας Πολιά]δος κα⋯ Νίκ[ες τόκ]…

^{page 63 note 3} The minimum for line 53 is taken from the calculation in Meritt, , The Athenian Clendar, p. 74Google Scholar, but it seems desirable to allow a maximum an obol or two greater as being nearer the result obtained with decimal notation.

^{page 63 note 4} Tod, op cit., p. 143.

^{page 64 note 1} Technically, one might perhaps restore still a fifth figure; but there is no reason here to be saving of space, and I believe now (as in 1928 that it is best to give the mark of punctuation a little room and allow the broad first figure to fill the second space.