The distinction between ΠANTAΣIA and ΔOΞA in Proclus’ In Timaeum

Peter Lautner

doi:10.1093/cq/52.1.257

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Crossref Citations

This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

LAUTNER, PETER 2004. THE KOINH AIΣΘHΣIΣ IN PROCLUS AND PS.-SIMPLICIUS. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, Vol. 47, Issue. Supplement_83_Part_1, p. 163.

Martijn, Marije 2010. Proclus on the order of philosophy of nature. Synthese, Vol. 174, Issue. 2, p. 205.

2013.

CrossRef

Perälä, Mika 2014. Sourcebook for the History of the Philosophy of Mind. Vol. 12, Issue. , p. 301.

Tuominen, Miira 2014. Sourcebook for the History of the Philosophy of Mind. Vol. 12, Issue. , p. 107.

Otal, Milan 2016. Phantasia et nous pathêtikos. Méthodos, Vol. 16, Issue. ,

Marmodoro, Anna and Cartwright, Sophie 2018. A History of Mind and Body in Late Antiquity.

2019.

CrossRef

Moss, Jessica 2020. Plato'sDoxa. Analytic Philosophy, Vol. 61, Issue. 3, p. 193.

2021.

CrossRef

Garner, John V. 2026. Learning from imagination: Proclus in dialogue with a contemporary debate. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 64, Issue. 3, p. 325.

Article contents

The distinction between ΠANTAΣIA and ΔOΞA in Proclus’ In Timaeum

Abstract

Information

This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Article contents

The distinction between ΠANTAΣIA and ΔOΞA in Proclus’ In Timaeum

Abstract

Information

Save article to Kindle

Save article to Dropbox

Save article to Google Drive

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests