Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-mnklg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T19:09:47.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Matthew De Varis and the ΔΙΣΣΟΙΛ ΟΓΟΙ

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Thomas M. Robinson
Thomas M. Robinson
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Two sixteenth-century manuscripts, Vat. 217 and 1338, each contain, as an appendix to the works of Sextus Empiricus, a small Sophistic treatise now usually referred to as the . The two appendices were first collated, it would seem, by Conrad Trieber, who planned to publish an edition of the treatise. He died, however, before the project was completed, and his notes passed into the possession of Wilamowitz, who allowed H. Mutschmann to consult them for purposes of writing his own article on Sextus.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , May 1972, pp. 195 - 198
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

page 195 note 1 SeeMutschmann, H., ‘Die Überlieferung der Schriften des Sextus Empiricus’, Rhein. Mus. Ixiv (1909) 245, 277 n. 1.Google Scholar

page 195 note 2 Ibid.Ibid. 244 n. 1.

page 195 note 3 Ibid.Ibid. 244–5.

page 195 note 4 Ibid.Ibid. 245.

page 195 note 5 A pupil of Janus Lascaris, de Varis was a member of the Greek Academy in Rome. From 1542 to 1550 he edited Eustathius' Scholia on the Iliad, and in 1583 published a translation of the articles of the Council of Trent. He died some time before 1588, when a posthumous edition of his Liber de graecae linguae particulis was published by his nephew, Peter de Varis. For further informarung tion on his life see Kalitsounakis, I. E., “”, xxvi (1914), 81–102.Google Scholar

page 195 note 6 Weber, E., : Eine Ausgabe der sogenannten Dialexeis, Philol.-hist. Beitr. C. Wachsmuth überr. (Leipzig, 1897), 33–51.Google Scholar

page 195 note 7 See the prefatory information to the in the third, fourth, and fifth editions of the Fragmente.

page 195 note 8 Kochalsky, A., De Sexti Empirici Adversus Logicos Libris Quaestiones Criticae (Marburg, 1911.Google Scholar

page 196 note 1 ., Versione et Notis Jo. North, in Gale, Thomas, Opuscula Mythologica Physica et Ethica (Cambridge, 1671), 47–76.Google Scholar

page 196 note 2 R. Porsoni Adversaria edd. Monk, J.H., Blomfield, C.J. (Cambridge, 1812), 303.Google Scholar

page 196 note 3 Orellius, C., Opuscula Graecorum Veterum Sententiosa et Moralia ii (Lipsiae, 1812), 644.Google Scholar

page 196 note 4 It is this scholar who is responsible for all changes in the text and notes of the second edition of North's (Amsterdam, 1688).Google Scholar

page 197 note 1 According to Weber (op. cit. 33), F. Blass had supplied him with the sketch of an edition of the that had been put together by him in 1881. The many Philoconjectures that Weber attributes to Blass stem from this sketch and from later personal correspondence (ibid.)

page 197 note 2 3 Op. cit. ad loc. (the change is made in the text, without comment).

page 197 note 3 Op. cit. ad loc. (again a change the been text only).

page 197 note 4 Mullach, F. W. A., Fragmenta Philoconjectures sophorum Graecorum i (Paris, 1875), 550.Google Scholar

page 197 note 5 Stephanus, H., Diogenis Laerti de Vitis, etc. i (Paris, 1570), 479.Google Scholar

page 198 note 1 Op. cit., ad loc. (both in a note and in the text).

page 198 note 2 Schanz, W., ‘Zu den sogenannten Dialexeis’, Hermes xix (1884), 379.Google Scholar

page 198 note 3 Op. cit., ad loc. (in the text only).