^{page 113 note 2} 726 sqq.

^{page 113 note 3} 225.

^{page 113 note 4} Lyrics from Elizabethan Songbooks, ed. 1913, p. 210.

^{page 113 note 5} Proposed apparently by D. Heinsius on the basis of Proclus's note: óπoîoσ θν έκάστψ τυγχάŋ βίoσ άπο;δομένoςς. Rzach's critical note fails to record the conjecture, though it is adopted by Paley and Sittl.

^{page 114 note 1} Cf. Heracl. fr. 97 Bywater, Plat. Crat. 398B, E.M. p. 35, 24.

^{page 114 note 2} See Goodwin, , Moods and Tenses, p. 318Google Scholar.

^{page 114 note 3} β. 58 υά γάρ Ëπ à⋯ʼnρ | οįος Όδύσεύς Ëσκν àρήν àπò οĨκου | ημείς δ νύ ⋯L τοîοı àμυνÉμεν β.272, ξ. 491, ρ 537, χ 234.

^{page 114 note 4} Pind. Ol. ii. 107 is debated. On Pindar's other examples see Gildersleeve, in Am. Phil. Soc. Trans. 1878, p. 11Google Scholar.

^{page 114 note 5} So also in Sophocles, Herodotus and Thucydides: see Birklein's statistics in Schanz's, Beiträge, 1888Google Scholar, Heft 7. ProfessorGildersleeve, (l.c. p. 8)Google Scholar writes: ‘What was the infinitive to the Greek himself? If anything definite, an accusative it would seem. … The use of the infinitive as an object led in time to its use as a subject.’

^{page 114 note 6} υ. 52, Hes. fr. 164. Grammarians (except Birklein, who thinks it corrupt) seem to have overlooked our passage.

^{page 115 note 1} Lehrs, (Quaest. Eþ. p. 1931)Google Scholar proposed a lacuna after 416 on the ground that χρώς means ‘skin,’ and was only used of the body where the surface of the body was concerned. This is probably true of the common use in connexion with clothing and armour (e.g. ψ. 67 περἱ χροι ειματα εστο), but is too sweeping in view of such phrases as Ω. 414 oὐύδÉ τί οί χρὡς σ⋯πεται oὐδε μιν εὐλαί | εύθoυσιν.

^{page 115 note 2} N 279, 284. P 733. ϕ 412.

^{page 115 note 3} Varro, , R.R. i. 19Google Scholar. 1. Cato's estimates are for vineyards one pair per 100 iugera, for oliveyards one pair per 80 iugera (R.R. x. xi.).

^{page 115 note 4} Cf. 608. Of course Hesiod may be thinking of one plough and its team as a unit or minimum (contrast however the singular at 405). The plurals elsewhere in the poem, however, prove nothing, for he uses the plural even of a single yoke (434, 468). Still this indication as to the size of his farm would be of very slight value if anything more definite were forthcoming.

^{page 115 note 5} N.H. xviii. 178 iustum est froscindi sulco dodrantali iugerum uno die … si sit fcuilitas soli. Probably therefore it is much the same as the Spanish measure iugum, defined as quod uno iugo boum uno die exarari posset. (Varro, , R.R. i. 10Google Scholar. 1, Plin, . N.H. xviii. 9.)Google Scholar See Hultsch, further, Metrologie², p. 841Google Scholar, Mommsen, , Röm. Gesch⁷. i. p. 204¹Google Scholar. On γὐμς see schol. ad I. 579, E.M 242. 23, Hesyeh. s. vv. πεντηκοντbγυος τετράγυον, Eustath. pp. 776Google Scholar. 60 1572. 18, 1851. 62. Smith, Dict. Ant. ii. 161aGoogle Scholar. If the modern explanation is right, τετρ⋯γυοoν at σ. 374 (and Ap. Rhod, . iii. 412, Orþh. Arg. 874)Google Scholar is puzzling, but those who think τετρ⋯γυον to be a day's ploughing reduce Meleager's reward to a very small holding. An acre is also a day's ploughing, larger than the iugerum, perhaps owing to the employment of a larger plough team. See Seebohm, F., English Village Community, pp. 124, 387Google Scholar.

^{page 116 note 1} Columella, 1. 3. 10, id. praef. 14, Pliny, , N.H. xviii. 18Google Scholar, Val. Max. iv. 3. 5.

^{page 116 note 2} Seebohm, , op. cit. pp. 27Google Scholar, 73, 389.

^{page 116 note 3} Ibid. p. 65.

^{page 116 note 4} See Smith, , Dict. Ant. i. p. 86 aGoogle Scholar.

^{page 116 note 5} Script. Gromat. pp. 115, 136, 152, Lachm, Google Scholar.

^{page 116 note 6} R.R. i. 34. 1. Cf. Pliny, , N.H. xviii. 204Google Scholar.

^{page 117 note 1} At Eratosth, . Catast. 35Google Scholar (whence Liddell and Scott quote στoλlς ⋯κρ⋯ = ⋯κρoστ⋯λιoν) στυλ⋯ς should apparently be read.

^{page 117 note 2} Eur, . I.T. 289Google Scholar, cf. Aesch, . Ag. 52Google Scholar, Lucian, i. 151; and in Latin, Lucr. vi. 743, Verg, . Aen. i. 301Google Scholar, vi. 19, Ov, . A.A. ii. 45Google Scholar, Met. v. 558, viii. 228, Apul, . Met. v. 25Google Scholar, Cic, . N.D. ii. 125Google Scholar, and conversely Prop. iv. 6. 47.

^{page 117 note 3} Alex. 559. swan, Milton'sGoogle Scholar, more naturally, at least to an ear, English, ‘rows with oary feet’ (P.L. vii. 439)Google Scholar, and so Ausonius, , Epist. iii. 13Google Scholarremipedes anates.

^{page 117 note 4} Plut, . Mor. 22Google Scholar f., E.M. 36. 24.

^{page 117 note 5} iii. 122b, c.

^{page 117 note 6} See further Picart, , Cérémonies et Coutumes (Amsterdam, 1723), i. p. 113Google Scholar; Burton, , Arabian Nights, ii. p. 326Google Scholar.

^{page 118 note 1} Commentators quote a saying of Pythagoras παρ⋯ θυσ⋯αν μ⋯ ⋯νυχζoυ, the context of which may be illuminating; but I do not know what the context is. Goettling gives a false reference and other commentators none. I cannot find the saying, and have some suspicion that it may be a figment, due to some confusion with the apophthegm quoted below, n. 5.

^{page 118 note 2} Ov, . F. vi. 230Google Scholar. Cf. Frazer, , Taboo and the Perils of the Soul, pp. 258Google Scholar sqq.

^{page 118 note 3} Petron. 103, 104: Frazer, however, connects this prohibition with the power of cut hair to storms, raise (op. cit. p. 271)Google Scholar.

^{page 118 note 4} N.H. xxviii. 28.

^{page 118 note 5} Orestes cut his hair: Strabo, p. 535, Paus. viii. 34. 3, Frazer, , op. cit. pp. 283Google Scholar sqq. A Hebrew in prayer, according to Picart, (Cérémonies et Coutumes, i. p. 107)Google Scholar, ‘doit éviter autant qu'il se peut, de bâiller, de cracher, de se moucher, de laisser aller des vents;’ but that perhaps a matter of deportment rather than of superstition. The uncleanness of nail parings is perhaps implied in the saying quoted by Hershon, (Talmudic Miscellany, p. 49Google Scholar, cf. Picart, , op. cit. p. 113):Google Scholar he who trims his nails and buries the parings is a pious man; he who burns them is a righteous man; but he who throws them away is a wicked man, for mischance might follow should a female step over them. Pythagoras's injunction (Diog. Laert. viii. 1. 17: ⋯πνυχ⋯σμασι κα⋯ κουρας μ⋯ È ουρείν μηδÈ ÈΦίrασθαί) may be due only to the common fear of danger to the original owner of the nails.

^{page 118 note 6} Mor. 352 e.

^{page 118 note 7} Plut, . Mor. 8191Google Scholar e; Macrob. v. 19. 13; Frazer, , op. cit. pp. 225Google Scholar sqq.