Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-kwdml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T00:03:59.766Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

More Notes on the Text of Hesiod

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

M. L. West
M. L. West
Affiliation:
St. John's College, Oxford
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

These notes are a supplement to those which formed the second part of my ‘Hesiodea’. In part they result from re-examination of manuscripts and papyri undertaken for a projected commentary on the Theogony.

In discussing the text of Hesiod a prime necessity is a new system of sigla. Rzach's system has the grave disadvantage that in the three extant poems the same manuscript is denoted by different letters, and conversely the same letter denotes different manuscripts.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , December 1962, pp. 171 - 181
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

page 177 note 1 C.Q. N.S. xi (1961), 130 ff.Google Scholar

page 178 note 1 In this case the first ϊ must either be changed to δ with Rzach (following Pepp-müller, , Philologus xxxix [1880], 388)Google Scholar or deleted (Bergk). Lennep's information that it is absent in cod. Par. 2678 is false.

page 178 note 2 is in fact a marginal variant in L; L and Q, have [sic] in the text.

page 180 note 1 See now Arrighetti, G., Athenaeum N.s. xxxix (1961), 246.Google Scholar