^{page 57 note 1} See E. Martini and D. Bassi, Catalogus codicum Graecorum Bibliothecae Ambrosianae (Milan U. Hoepli; 2 vols., 1906); Wilamowitz, , op. cit., pp. 12–13Google Scholar. For the Homeric Hymns it is known as D.

^{page 57 note 2} Cf. At.

^{page 57 note 3} Cf. Q, II, At.

^{page 57 note 4} See on II, C.Q. 1920, p. 105; and cf. At and I.

^{page 57 note 5} Cf. H, Λ, I, Br etc.

^{page 58 note 1} Martini and Bassi, l.c.

^{page 58 note 2} See Mahaffy, in Athenaeum, 1889, pp. 631Google Scholar sqq.; Constantinides in Class. Rev. VIII. (1894), pp. 341–2Google Scholar, The Athos MS. of the Homeric Hymns; Wilamowitz, , op. cit., pp. 12–13Google Scholar; Allen, T. W. in J.H.S., XV. (1895), pp, 149–150Google Scholar.

^{page 58 note 3} Constantinides, l.c.

^{page 58 note 4} Cf. Q, II, F.

^{page 58 note 5} Cf. F.

^{page 58 note 6} See on II, C.Q. 1920, p. 105; and cf. F and I.

^{page 58 note 7} See Schneider, Praef. XXXII.

^{page 58 note 8} Ibid.

^{page 58 note 9} See Catalogus Bibliothecae Publicae Universitatis Lugduno-Batavae (Leiden, 1716), p. 398Google Scholar; Schneider, , Praef. XXXII.–XXXIIIGoogle Scholar.

^{page 58 note 10} Cf. e.

^{page 58 note 11} Cf. E.

^{page 59 note 1} Cf. F, Λ, I, Bν.

^{page 59 note 2} See Rostagno, E. and Festa, N., Indice dei codici greci Laurenziani non compresi nel catalogo del Bandini (in Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica, Vol. I., Florence, 1893), p. 207Google Scholar; Nigra, , lib. cit., XX. (1892), pp. 206–7Google Scholar.

^{page 59 note 3} ‘Saibantianus 66, ex bibl. Caroli Millon’ (Rostagno and Festa, l.c.); Ashburnham, 1440 (1363) (Nigra, l.c.).

^{page 59 note 4} Cf. F, H, I, Br.

^{page 59 note 5} See Schneider, , Praef. XXXIII.–XXXIVGoogle Scholar.; Nigra, , lib. cit., XX. (1892), p. 205Google Scholar; de Nolhac, P., La Bibliothèque de Fulvio Orsini (Paris, 1887), p. 151Google Scholar.

^{page 59 note 6} Orsini's Inventory, item 97 (de Nolhac, p. 344); the fuller phrase in describing the Theocritus of Orsini, item 59 (= Vat. gr. 1311; de Nolhac, pp. 340, 125).

^{page 59 note 7} De Nolhac, p. 151.

^{page 59 note 8} Schneider, l.c.; cf. Galen's περì εὴχύμοѵ καì κακοχύμοѵ διαίτης..

^{page 59 note 9} Anth. Düb., Appendix, IV. 47, where it has 66 lines.

^{page 59 note 10} Anth. Düb., Appendix, VII. 2, where it has 7 lines.

^{page 59 note 11} So C.Dilthey apud Schneider, l.c. De Nolhac, p. 151, interprets it as ‘Corcyrae conscripsit, etc’

^{page 60 note 1} Cf. F, H, Λ, Br.

^{page 60 note 2} I. 10 παρνασίῃ text (corrector ρ for ν), 12 εìλειθѵíης(ѵλ for ѵι), 41 γѵωνοì (ѵí for γѵ), 46 ἑταîραι (ὢ–, and τα for ται), 48 λύκω (ει for ѵ), 68 θῆκας (έ, and ο for ς), 68 ύπέρχον (εí for έ), 80 κε (αí for ε), 80 λᾶξιν (ά), 84 ὂλβον (ѵ for ν); II. 2 οîο (–α), IO ĭδοι (–ει), 12 κíθαριν (corrected in text-size from –ην: marg. κέθαριν), 19 κíθαριν (κν), 20 ἀχιλέα (ῆ for έ), 21 Ἰη twice (ἳη), 33 τά τ' ἄημμα (τó τ'). 51 οῖσιν (ἧ for οῖ), 52 ἀγἀλακτες (corrected first by scribe from –ος: τοι for τες), 63 ἐπεβάλλετο ($$v$$–); III. 171 οἰνωποῖο (ἰ– for οἰ–), 175 μὴνει òν (sic) become united by a stroke, 179 κεραελκέες (κερεαλκ–), 184 ἒξοχον (–χα), 188 εύρύποιο (í for ύ), 195 δέ put between καì and σχεδòν, 198 νύμπην (α for η), 204 ἄναξ (–σσ'), 205 κρηταέες to κρητάιες (the accent between α and ι), 215 ἥνѵσας (η for ν), 221 λῦκον (ῥοῖκον), 224 ἀκρώρειαν (strokes through ν), 231 τεύκρω (–ων), 239 πѵγῷ (η for ѵ), 244 (τερήναντο (ον for αν), 248 ε$$v$$ρѵθέμειλον (–θέμεθλον), 250 ῥεῖα (έ for εῖ), 260 σὴν (tau;–), 260 οíνοῖ (εῖ), 261 ἀτιμήσαντι (ά for ή), 261 πóλιν) πτ–), 265 ὠρíων (ὠα for ω), IV, 4 ἐθέλοι (–ει), 7 ἀεíσοι (–ει), 10 καíριος (κύνθιος) 12 αíθѵíαις (εις set above but scored out, text altered to –ης), 15 ἀδάσσαντο (νν for δ), 16 πρώτοισι (–ησι), 19 ὂπισθεν (δ deleted), 62 ἐποπτεύοντες ($$v$$–), θαύματος (to –αντος), 72 παρακέλιται (marg. κ to precede λ), 84 άέξοι (–ει).

^{page 60 note 3} See on II C.Q. 1920, p. 105 and cf. F and At.

^{page 61 note 1} Br has II. 21 íη twice; III. 175 μήνειὃν.

^{page 61 note 2} Orsini's inventory (de Nolhac, , op. cit. p. 344Google Scholar) thus describes the MS.: ‘97. Theocrito integro et riveduto da Pietro Candido con un edyllio di più, Hymni de Callimacho. Osservationi sopra le locutioni poetiche. Petosiris epistolae ad Necepsum regem et altre cose, libro riveduto tutto da Pietro Candido, coperto di cartone, in papiro in –4°’ (my italics). That this volume is a composite of several originally detached MSS.; that f. 58 seems to go with ff. 35–57, Callimachus being thus gathered in ternions or quaternions; and that the alterations in Callimachus appear to come from the text–hand—all these facts point to Candido's not having used his pen on the Callimachean portion of I.

^{page 61 note 3} Hall, F. W., Companion to Classical Texts, p. 309Google Scholar, s.v. Decembrius; Eckstein, F. A., Nomenclator Philologorum (Teubner, 1871), p. 114Google Scholar.

^{page 61 note 4} L.c.; and 1477 is given by de' Rosmini, C., Vita di Francesco Filelfo (Milan, 1808), III. p. 34Google Scholar. Mr. Hall (l.c.) is silent on the matter, and Symonds, J. A., Renaissance in Italy: The Revival of Learning, 2nd edition, 1882, p. 266Google Scholar, says 1447; but later (p. 271) he quotes from a letter which Candido ‘wrote to Poggio in 1453.’

^{page 61 note 5} See British Museum Catalogue.

^{page 61 note 6} Cf. F, H, Λ, I.

^{page 62 note 1} Only the first hand of I is meant throughout the following discussions, except where the second is expressly indicated.

^{page 62 note 2} z detached means the common ancestor of the seven MSS.; attached to a reading, it will be used to indicate the consensus of FHIBν. Where G or Λ is not added to z, the term cett. does not include either MS.; but known opposition of either to z will be set forth. G is cited mainly on Schneider's authority, with a few additions from Nigra; Λ, exclusively from Nigra. Ed. pr. is cited in evidence of its connexion with I, and is called ‘Lasc.’

^{page 63 note 1} Λ, of which I have very few readings, is seldom cited here or for genders.

^{page 66 note 1} z ² indicates below, sometimes the common source of GHΛIBν, sometimes (i.e. when attached to a reading) only the consensus of HIBν.

^{page 66 note 2} That Bν is a copy of I will be proved later, For the inversion cf. q from Q at VI. 77 (C.Q. 1920. p. 74, note 2).

^{page 67 note 1} π with the top open would resemble γ with the second stroke looped.

^{page 67 note 2} It seems likely, in view of the marked diversities between GHΛ and I, that they are respectively descended from two ‘sons’ of z ². Of course, it is possible that more than one generation intervened, in either or both cases; and this would make the problem at VI. 92 (below) more comprehensible.

^{page 71 note 1} Cross-currents number only 13, viz., 1 major and 8 minor cases of FI against HBν; 1 minor case of FI against GH; and 1 major and 2 minor cases of FBν against HI.

^{page 71 note 2} At III. 118, I's τó ῥαποστάζουσι (ο after π is a correction from α) looks like haplography from τó ῥα πρς ἀποστάζουσι.

^{page 74 note 1} See J.H.S., XV. (1895), pp. 149–150.