Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T18:09:58.134Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Problems of Text and Interpretation in Statius, Thebaid VII–XII

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

P. T. Eden
P. T. Eden*
Affiliation:
Forest Hill, Oxford
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The following works are referred to by author's surname only: H. W. Garrod, P. Papini Stati Thebais et Achilleis (Oxford, 1906); D. E. Hill, P. Papini Stati Thebaidos Libri XII [Mnemosyne Supplement 79 (Leiden, 1983)]; A. Klotz, P. Papini Stati Thebais (Leipzig, 1908; revised edn by T. C. Klinnert, 1973); R. Lesueur, Stace Thébaïde (Paris, 1990, 1991, 1994; 3 vols); J. H. Mozley, Statius (Loeb edn, London, 1928; 2 vols); J. J. Smolenaars, Statius, Thebaid VII [Mnemosyne Supplement 134 (Leiden, 1994)]; P. Venini, P. Papini Stati Thebaidos Liber XI (Firenze, 1970).

Information

Type
Shorter Notes
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , May 1999, pp. 332 - 336
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 Smolenaars 164, taking hic (353) = ‘here’ = ‘at Thebes’, persists in his view that the reference is not to the Python, but to the pestilence which had recently ravaged Thebes. It is difficult to visualize how this could be pictorially represented.

2 By the anonymous referce.

3 elicita persists in T. C. Klinnert's revised Teubner edition of Klotz, who, however, in the Corrigenda et Addenda of his first edition (1908) abandoned elicita (‘uocem… inanem esse concedo’) in favour of his later suggestion iniecta.

4 Hermes 40 (1905), 362–3.

5 Mnemosyne 57 (1929), 261.

6 Lesueur finds another way out of the difficulty with the conjecture interea stridere (historic infinitive) faces.

7 Venini 73–6, while noting with disapproval that Damsté, P. H. (Mnemosyne 37 [1909], 104)Google Scholar had suggested ending Aepytus’ speech with armis 247.

8 Not Aegyptus, as Klinnert twice names him in his note on Th. 11.246ff.

9 CR 53 (1940), 13, after Alton, E. H. had completely misunderstood the situation in CQ 17 (1923), 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar