¹ Propertius (Loeb 1912, repr. 1962), p. 169.Google Scholar

² The Poems of Sextus Propertius (Chichester, 1961), p. 96.Google Scholar

³ Latin Poetry: the New Poets and the Augustans (New Haven and London, 1965), p. 202. Cf.Google ScholarMusker, R., The Poems of Propertius (London, 1972), p. 125Google Scholar and Warden, J., The Poems of Propertius (Indianapolis and New York, 1972), p. 129.Google Scholar

⁴ Cf. e.g. ‘endowed among other remarkable attributes with the gift of speech’, Camps, W. A., Propertius: Elegies Book II (Cambridge, 1967), p. 228Google Scholar; ‘Arion, Adrastus’ marvellous horse with the power of speech and one human foot', Richardson, L. Jr., Propertius: Elegies I–IV (Norman, Oklahoma, 1977), p. 313Google Scholar; ‘…a speaking racehorse's victory and mourning at an infant's funeral games’, Stahl, H.-P., Propertius: ‘Love’ and ‘War’ : Individual and State under Augustus (Berkeley, Los Angeles and London, 1985), p. 175.Google Scholar

⁵ Camps, op. cit. (n. 4), p. 228.

⁶ Shackleton Bailey, D. R., Propertiana² (Amsterdam, 1967), p. 133.Google Scholar

⁷ ‘Qualis’ stresses the wonderful nature of the horse, which was born of Gaia, σβας θνητοῖσιν ἰδσθαι (Antim. F 32.5 Wyss; cf. ς θεφιν γνος ἦεν, Il. 23.347). Diomedes' horses too were of divine origin, bred by Anchises from those given to Tros by Zeus and captured from Aeneas by Diomedes (Il. 5.265ff.), who won the chariot race at the Patroclus Games with them (Il. 23.290–513).

⁸ As noticed by Richardson, pp. 313–14.

⁹ Il. 19.404ff.

¹⁰ Cf. Edwards, Mark W., Homer: Poet of the Iliad (Baltimore and London, 1987), pp. 287–8.Google Scholar

¹¹ Il. 23.346–7 (see also scholia ad loc); Cyclic Thebaid F6^A Davies EGF; Antimachus F32, 33, 35 Wyss.

¹² The thought is closely paralleled in Prop. 1.9.9–10. Cf. Vessey, D. W. T. C., PVS 9 (1969–1970), 60–2.Google Scholar

¹³ Arion is mentioned in F32 and 33 Wyss and is possibly the subject in F36. Propertius' earlier references to the rivers Achelous and Maeander (33–6), may be to the Heraclea of Panyassis, cf. Vessey, PVS 9, p. 62.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Il. 17.427; 437–41; 23.283–4.

¹⁵ F12.8 West.

¹⁶ Phaedrus 269a5.

¹⁷ Possibly the Cyclic Thebaid, cf. P. von der Mühll in Meyer, G., Die stilistische Verwendung der Nominalkomposition im Griechischen (Philol. Suppl. 16.3 [1923]. p. 23 n. 2)Google Scholar; Merkelbach, R., Kritische Beiträge zu antiken Autoren (Meisenheim, 1974), pp. 2fGoogle Scholar. But Bernabé (Poetae Epici Graeci) lists it as Fragmentum Dubium (11), sharing the caution of Davies, M., Mus. Helv. 37 (1980), 131–2Google Scholar. Davies himself, however, does not include it in his EGF.

¹⁸ Hor. Od. 1.12.7–8; cf. ‘ille vocali genitus Camena’ (i.e. Orpheus), Sen. Med. 625.

¹⁹ Ovid, Met. 3.357–8.

²⁰ Apul. Met. 6.7.

²¹ Ovid, Fasti 2.91.

²² The speaking cow or ox is a commonplace in such lists, e.g. Livy, 3.10.6; Val. Max. 1.6.5. Pliny (H.N. 8.183) says ‘est frequens in prodigiis priscorum bovem locutum’.

²³ Il. 19.404ff.; cf. especially ‘fata monentem conversumque iugo’ with ὑπ ζυγθι προσφη, 404. Cf. H. Juhnke, Homerisches in römischer Epik flavischer Zeit (Zetemata, Heft 53, München, 1972), p. 368.

²⁴ Cf. Cyclic Thebaid F6^A Davies EGF; Paus. 8.25.7; Apollod. 3.6.8; Hygin, Fab. 70.