Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-cbk24 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T12:20:57.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Restorations and Emendations in Livy VI.–X

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

C. Flamstead Walters and
R. S. Conway
C. Flamstead Walters
Affiliation:
London, Manchester, July 1918
R. S. Conway
Affiliation:
London, Manchester, July 1918
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

X. 13. 10, with X. 33. 3. (Fabius Maximus is protesting against his own re-election as consul in defiance of the law.)

Et ille quidem in recusando perstabat: quid ergo attineret leges ferri rogitans quibus per eosdem, qui tulissent, fraus fieret; iam regi leges non regere.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 12 , Issue 3-4 , October 1918, pp. 113 - 119
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1918

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

page 115 note 1 E.g. 3. 26. 9 (Cincinnatus) rogatus ut, quod bene uerteret, togatus mandata senatus audiret; 29. 22. 5 iuberentque, quod di bene uerterent, traicere.

page 116 note 1 As well as Drakenborch and later Frigell, (Dissertatio de Livii emendandi ratione, p. 30)Google Scholar.

page 118 note 1 Perhaps eam would be better, but the eum of Vind. may be defended if faceret is not oblique but only post-prophetic, ‘was bound to make’; cf. the interesting collection of examples of this use by MrGoodrich, W. J., Class. Rev. XXXI. (1917), p. 83CrossRefGoogle Scholar.