Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T02:04:18.231Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Signor Ferrero or Caesar?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Extract

Signor Ferrero has courteously replied to the article in the Classical Quarterly of July, 1909, in which I gave reasons for preferring Caesar's First Commentary to his reconstruction. He thinks that I failed to seize his main point, which, he says, is represented by this question: Why did Caesar conclude an alliance with Ariovistus in 59 b.c. and break it in the following year? Any one who may have read my article with care will have seen that I recognized that this point was capital.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1910

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable