Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T22:10:13.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some observations on the Persae of Timotheus (PMG 791)*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

J. H. Hordern
J. H. Hordern
Affiliation:
University College Dublin
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

At lines 7–10 the description of the sea-battle appears to involve the destruction of the oars of the enemy ship (accepting Page's ῥηγì[κωπ] ος at 9), with the result that the sailors fall over (9–10 suppl. Danielsson). We would expect lines 11–13 to provide some sort of contrast with this description, since εἰ δέ at 11 contrasts with 7 ảλλ’ εἰμέυ, but the exact sense is not quite clear.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , December 1999, pp. 433 - 438
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 Page prints ῥηξί], but the iota is no longer visible in the papyrus.

2 [ἂμ’] suppl. M. L. West (p.c.).

3 Page wrongly prints cho. ia.

4 Although πλώσιμος is regarded as three-termination by Diogenian., adjectives in -ιμος are usually two-termination in Timotheus; cf. PMG 791.64, 112–3.

5 See Tarn, W. W., JHS 25 (1905), 143ff.; J. S. Morrison, CQ 41 (1947), 122–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 The referee suggests that the ships could be the subject of ⋯ϕέροντο, which is possible, but I think να⋯ται is to be preferred because of the parallel with 7–10.

7 The referee suggests that ‘a masculine nominative may be lurking in line 16’, which is also possible.

8 Gildersleeve, B., AJP 24 (1903), 232–3.Google Scholar

9 See Casson, L., Ships and Seamanship in the Ancient World (Baltimore and London, 1995), 239, n. 67.Google Scholar

10 Wilamowitz, 57–9.

11 See Chantraine, P., Grammaire Homérique (Paris, 1958–63), 2.113–4,Google Scholar for the similar sense of κατά c. accusative and genitive.

12 Jurenka, H., ZÖG 54 (1903), 579.Google Scholar

13 See Marsden, E. W., Greek and Roman Artillery: Historical Development (Oxford, 1969), 171.Google Scholar

14 Page wrongly prints αὒραι.

15 Sudhaus, S., RhM 58 (1903), 482.Google Scholar

16 Gargiulo, T., QUCC 54 (1996), 73–81.Google Scholar

17 Sitzler, J., Bursians Jahresb. 133 (1907), 250.Google Scholar

18 J. Sitzler (n. 17), 251.

19 Inama, V., RIL 36 (1903), 615.Google Scholar