Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T00:47:53.560Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Passages of the Agamemnon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

H. D. Broadhead
H. D. Broadhead
Affiliation:
Christchurch, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In this article I deal with difficulties, textual and exegetical, in ten passages of the Agamemnon. In some passages there is wide agreement on the sense required, but not on the remedies proposed for a corrupt reading: here I venture to put forward fresh proposals that seem to possess a reasonable1 degree of palaeo-graphical probability (1347, 1659). In another passage I argue for a new interpretation with its appropriate emendation (1339). In some cases where the sense is hardly in doubt and the text not certainly corrupt, I propose what seems on linguistic or other grounds a preferable reading (496,966,1409,1630), or I argue in favour of some other scholar's proposal (319). Finally, where there can be little, if any, likelihood of successful restoration, I offer a tentative suggestion which may give at least an approximation to the original text (1657).

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 9 , Issue 3-4 , November 1959 , pp. 310 - 316
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

page 310 note 1 After all the labour expended on the text of the Agamemnon it is unlikely that absolutely convincing emendations will be forthcoming

page 311 note 1 1096, 1217, 1242. Atreus' sin is referred to twice: (1185), (1197), and in 1223 the punishment for it is foretold. It is probable that in 1340 is an echo of .s in 1223. In both passages I believe the punishment is said to fall on Agamemnon.

page 311 note 2 In 1500ff. the murder of Agamemnon is regarded as punishment for Atreus' crime, and naturally so, since from 1468 the theme has been the . Earlier in the scene Clytemnestra thinks of Agamemnon's murder as justice realized for her child (1432), whose sacrifice (1417) called for another sacrifice (that of Agamemnon, 1509).

page 312 note 1 For of the MSS. I think we should read in P.V. 187).

page 313 note 1 Fraenkel exaggerates the number of those [in favour of immediate action’ (p. 644). Speakers 8 and 9 should not be counted in, and, as will be seen later, I would exclude also 4 and 5.

page 316 note 1 Lindau had proposed irpos .