No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Textile Term Scutulatus
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 February 2009
Extract
The received translation and interpretation of many of the technical terms current in the textile industry of the Roman Empire are inaccurate, because lexicographers have either fought shy of being precise, or have thought that they recognized in the ancient world technical processes which originated at a much later date. The evidence is often equivocal or insufficient, but may still yield details that have been overlooked.
The textile expression scutulatus, to take an example, deserves more attention than Blümner has devoted to it. When it refers to the appearance of a garment, Lewis and Short, s.v. scutulatus, translate ‘diamond or lozenge-shaped, checkered’. It seems worth while to attempt a more precise translation, and, if possible, to estimate the significance in context of the goods so designated.
Information
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1964
References
page 263 note 1 Blümner, H., Die römischen Privataltertümer (1911), pp. 240, 253.Google Scholar
page 263 note 2 Censorinus, ed. F. Hultsch, 1867.
page 263 note 3 Vitruvius, , de architectura, 7. 1.Google Scholar
page 263 note 4 Pliny, , Nat. Hist. 8. 196.Google Scholar
page 263 note 5 Baum, W. La, Die Entwicklung des Textilhandwerks in Alteuropa, (1955), p. 138.Google Scholar
page 263 note 6 Palladius, , de agric. 4. 13. 3 (ed. Schmitt, J. C. [1898], 51).Google Scholar
page 263 note 7 Isidore, , Origines 12. 1. 48.Google Scholar
page 264 note 1 On date see Charlesworth, M. P., C.Q. xxii (1928), 93.Google Scholar
page 264 note 2 Pliny, , op. cit. 8. 191.Google Scholar
page 264 note 3 Stud. z. Paläographie u. Papyruskunde xx (1921), nr. 41. 5.Google Scholar
page 264 note 4 Schlabow, K., ‘Der Thorsberger Mantel, der Schlüssel zum altgermanischen Web-stuhl’, Festschrift f. G. Schwantes (1951), pp. 176ff., 180.Google Scholar
page 264 note 5 Crowfoot, G. M., ‘Two textiles from the National Museum, Edinburgh’, Proc. Society of Antiquaries of Scotland lxxxii (1947–1948), 227.Google Scholar
page 265 note 1 Ed. I. Hilberg (1916), Corpus Script. Eccl. Lat. 54.
page 265 note 2 Lydus, de Magist. 1. 100 (ed. Wünsch, R. [1903]).Google Scholar
page 265 note 3 Conveniently in E. R. Graser, ‘The Edict of Diocletian on Maximum Prices’, appendix to Frank, T., An Economic Survey of Ancient Rome (1940), v.Google Scholar
page 265 note 4 Vogt, E., ‘Ein spätantiker Gewebefund aus dem Wallis’, Germania xviii (1934), 198 ff.Google Scholar
page 266 note 1 Braun, J., ‘Die spätrömischen Stoffe aus dem Sarkophag des hl. Paulinus zu Trier,’ Zeitschrift f. christliche Kunst xxiii (1910), 279. 347.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by