Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T18:13:01.059Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Three emendations in Columella

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Michael Winterbottom
Michael Winterbottom
Affiliation:
Corpus Christi College, Oxford, michael.winterbottom@ccc.ox.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I refer to the editions of the third book of Columella by S. Hedberg (Uppsala, 1968) and J. C. Dumont (Paris, 1993).

… nullus tamen uel iniquissimus locus non maiorem quaestum reddet quam acceperit inpensam: siquidem, ut cultoris neglegentia sex milia seminum intereant, reliqua tamen decem milia tribus milibus nummorum libenter et cum lucro redemptorum erunt… 3.3.12–13

Information

Type
Shorter Notes
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , December 1999 , pp. 633 - 634
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 I first thought of ‘redemptorum ementur’. But libenter seems to demand an active verb.

2 Columella regularly uses uirentia as a plural noun to mean ‘growing things’ (1.5.8; 2.2.23; 3.1.9 [of vines], 3.6.4 [of vines]; 3.8.1; 4.1.4 [of vines]; 9.5.6; 11.3.50). But of course that does not mean he cannot use the word as a participle (so 9.4.4 ‘semina [in a different sense] … crudo caespite uirentia’).

3 P.-P. Corsetti ingeniously suggests (Dumont, 97) that tempestate might derive from a dittography of per [‘écrit avec un p barré’] (a)estatem.