No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009

page 108 note 1 The same formula in 497 has
, and the sense demands a future.
page 110 note 1 I have observed a similar tendency, isolated it is true, in the very best (19/) Attic prose: see Cambridge Compositions, p. 369. It must be the printer who, with a perversity natural to his kind, has further perpetrated the active form διαιτο⋯ντες. The English version, by one Ralegh, has ‘Their diet was simple.’