No CrossRef data available.

1 Surely the conjecture in Amph. 1042, me agam for me ducam, hardly deserves a place (p. 1372) in the Thesaurus.
2 Priscian (vol. i. p. 392 H.) ascribes to the ‘vetustissimi’ the use of ludifico for ludificor. On ludificatus sum see the (defective) passage in Nonius (p. 476 Me.).