Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T21:25:13.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The micaceous minerals in two indian clays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

S. K. Guha and
S. Sen
S. K. Guha
Affiliation:
Central Glass and Ceramic Research Institute, Calcutta, India
S. Sen
Affiliation:
Central Glass and Ceramic Research Institute, Calcutta, India
Get access

Abstract

Two clays of the kaolinite type, one from Bihar and the other from Kerala, were each separated into particle-size fractions greater than and smaller than 1·4 µ.e.s.d. X-ray diffraction, differential thermal analysis, cation-exchange capacity and moisture absorption determinations and chemical analysis of the fractions showed that the micaceous mineral was concentrated in the fine fraction of one whereas it was mostly in the coarse fraction of the other. The evidence suggests that the mineral in the former belongs to the illite group and in the latter to the mica group.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals Bulletin , Volume 5 , Issue 30 , December 1963, pp. 319 - 327
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adhikari, M., 1957. Ind. J. Soil. Sci., 5, 199.Google Scholar
Bishui, B. M., and Prasad, J., 1957. Cent. Glass Ceram. Res. Inst. Bull., 4, 193.Google Scholar
Carr, K., Grimshaw, R. W., and Roberts, A. L., 1952. Trans. Brit. Ceram. Soc., 51, 334.Google Scholar
Carr, K., Grimshaw, R. W., and Roberts, A. L., 1953. Trans. Brit. Cerarn. Soc., 52, 139.Google Scholar
Grim, R. E., 1934. Econ. Geol, 29, 659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grim, R. E., 1947. Amer. Min., 32, 493.Google Scholar
Grim, R. E., Bradley, W. F., and Brown, G., 1951. X-ray Identification and Crystal Structures of Clay Minerals (Brindley, G. W., editor). Mineralogical Society, London, Chapter V, p. 138.Google Scholar
Grim, R. E., Bray, R. H., and Bradley, W. F., 1937. Amer. Min., 22, 813.Google Scholar
Grim, R. E., and Rowland, R. A., 1942. Amer. Min., 27, 746, 801.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, R. W., Westerman, A., and Roberts, A. L., 1948. Trans. I Int. Ceram. Congr., p. 407.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. L., 1958. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall, Cliffs N. J., p. 189.Google Scholar
Keeling, P. S., 1958. Clay Min. Bull., 3, 271.Google Scholar
Keeling, P. S., 1961. Trans. Brit. Ceram. Sot., 60, 217.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, R. C., 1956. Clay Min. Bull., 3, 4.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, R. C., Walker, G. F., and Hart, R., 1949. Miner. Mag., 28, 704.Google Scholar
Misra, M. L., and Henry, E. C., 1949. Bull. Amer. Ceram. Soe., 28, 187.Google Scholar
Piper, C. S., 1950. Soil and Plant Analysis. University of Adelaide, Australia, p. 187.Google Scholar
Sen, S., and Guha, S. K., 1958. Trans. Ind. Ceram. Soe., 17, 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar