Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T09:53:46.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Formation damage and remedial stimulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

T. R. Harper and
D. C. Buller
T. R. Harper
Affiliation:
BP Research Centre, Chertsey Road, Sunbury-on-Thames, Middlesex TW16 7LN
D. C. Buller
Affiliation:
BP Research Centre, Chertsey Road, Sunbury-on-Thames, Middlesex TW16 7LN
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is argued that a wide range of engineering data and geological data is required to make confident prognoses or diagnoses of formation damage. Potential sources of data are reviewed, with comments on their limitations. It is proposed that microscopic failure can cause formation damage in macroscopically intact rock at stress concentrations around the wellbore. The significance of natural fractures is reviewed in relation to formation damage induced by diagenetic mineralization or invasion by lost circulation material. Removal of such plugging material by acid stimulation is assessed in relation to diverting agent requirements.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , October 1986, pp. 735 - 751
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Basan, P.B. (1985) Formation Damage Index Number: a model for evaluation of fluid sensitivity in shaly sandstones. Proc. Ann. Tech. Conf. and Exhibition of the Soc. Pet. Eng., SPE 14317.Google Scholar
Carathers, B.K., Milson, S. & Terracina, J.M. (1984) Polymer gelled block: a diverting agent for acid stimulations. Southwestern Petroleum Short Course, Texas Technological University, Lubbock, Texas.Google Scholar
Clementz, D.M. (1982) Alteration of rock properties by adsorption of petroleum heavy ends. Implications for Enhanced Oil Recovery, 3rd SPE/DOE Symp. Enhanced OiI Recovery, SPE/DOE 10683.Google Scholar
Gruesbeck, C. & Collins, R.E. (1982) Entrainment and deposition of fine particles in porous media. Soc. Pet. Eng. J., Dec. 847-856.Google Scholar
Harper, T.R. & Moftah, I. (1985) Skin effect and completion options in the Ras Budran reservoir. SPE Middle East Oil Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE 13708.Google Scholar
Hazen, A. (1911) Discussion of ‘Dams on Sand Foundations’ by A. C. Koenig. Trans. Am. Soc. C.E. 77, 199.Google Scholar
Kasperskii, B.V. & Panov, B.D. (1971) Investigations on plugging by weighted drilling muds on slotted models. Burenie 5, 28–31.(in Russian).Google Scholar
Muecke, T.W. (1982) Formation fines and factors controlling their movement in porous media. J. Pet. Tech. Feb., 144-150.Google Scholar
Murphy, H. & Pearce, R. (1980) Pressure losses in fracture-dominated reservoirs: the wellbore constriction effect, Geothermal Inst. 1980 Workshop, Univ. of Auckland, preprint.Google Scholar
Muskat, M. (1946) The Flow of Homogeneous Fluids through Porous Media. Edwards, Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
Tariq, S.M., Ichara, M.J. & Ayestaran, L. (1985) Performance of perforated completions in the presence of common heterogeneities: anisotropy, laminations or natural fractures. Proc. Ann. Tech. Conf. and Exhibition of the Soc. Pet. Eng., SPE 14320.Google Scholar
Taylor, D.W. (1948) Fundamentals of Soil Mechanics, pp 112–122. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Van Everdingen, A.F. (1953) The skin effect and its influence on the productive capacity of a well. Trans. AIME 198, 171–176.Google Scholar