Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T20:15:31.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Magnetic halloysite nanotubes for yeast cell surface engineering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

S.A. Konnova,
Y.M. Lvov and
R.F. Fakhrullin
S.A. Konnova
Affiliation:
Bionanotechnology Lab, Kazan Federal University, Kreml uramı 18, Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, Russian Federation
Y.M. Lvov
Affiliation:
Bionanotechnology Lab, Kazan Federal University, Kreml uramı 18, Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, Russian FederationInstitute for Micromanufacturing, Louisiana Tech University, USA
R.F. Fakhrullin*
Affiliation:
Bionanotechnology Lab, Kazan Federal University, Kreml uramı 18, Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, Russian Federation
*
*E-mail: kazanbio@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Halloysite clay nanotubes are safe and biocompatible nanomaterials and their application in biomaterials is very promising. The microencapsulation of yeast cells in the shell of clay nanotubes modifying their properties was demonstrated here. Each cell was coated with a 200–300 nm-thick tube shell and this coating was not harmful for these cells’ reproduction. Synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles on the surfaces of the nanotubes allowed for magnetic-field manipulation of the coated cells, including their separation. Providing nano-designed shells for biological cells is a step forward in development of ‘cyborg’ microorganisms combining their intrinsic properties with functions added through nano-engineering.

Keywords

halloysite nanotubesmagnetic nanoparticlesyeastcell-surface engineeringcyborg microorganismsviability

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , June 2016, pp. 429 - 433
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2016

References

Chiew, C.S.C., Yeoh, H.K., Pasbakhsh, P., Krishnaiah, K., Poh, P.E., Tey, B.T. & Chan, E.S. (2016) Halloysite/ alginate nanocomposite beads: Kinetics, equilibrium and mechanism for lead adsorption. Applied Clay Science, 119, 301–310.10.1016/j.clay.2015.10.032Google Scholar
Duan, J., Liu, R., Chen, T., Zhang, B. & Liu, J. (2012) Halloysite nanotube-Fe3O4 composite for removal of methyl violet from aqueous solutions. Desalination, 293, 46–52.10.1016/j.desal.2012.02.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dzamukova, M.R., Naumenko, E.A., Lannik, N.I. & Fakhrullin, R.F. (2013) Surface-modified magnetic human cells for scaffold-free tissue engineering. Biomaterials Science, 1, 810–813.10.1039/c3bm60054hGoogle Scholar
Dzamukova, M.R., Naumenko, E.A., Lvov, Y.M. & Fakhrullin, R.F. (2015) Enzyme-activated intracellular drug delivery with tubule clay nanoformulation. Scientific Reports, 5, 10560. doi:10.1038/srep10560.Google Scholar
Fakhrullin, R.F., Zamaleeva, A.I., Minullina, R.T., Konnova, S.A. & Paunov, V.N. (2012) Cyborg Сells: Functionalisation of Living Cells with Polymers and Nanomaterials. Chemical Society Reviews, 41, 4189–4206.10.1039/c2cs15264aGoogle Scholar
Fakhrullina, G.I., Akhatova, F.S., Lvov, Y.M. & Fakhrullin, R.F. (2015) Toxicity of halloysite clay nanotubes in vivo: a Caenorhabditis elegans study. Environmental Science: Nano, 2, 54–59.Google Scholar
Hong, D., Park, M., Yang, S.H., Lee, J., Kim, Y.-G. & Choi, I.S. (2013) Artificial spores: cytoprotective nanoencap-sulation of living cells. Trends in Biotechnology, 31, 442–447.10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.05.009Google Scholar
Hughes, A. & King, M. (2010) Use of naturally occurring halloysite nanotubes for enhanced capture of flowing cells. Langmuir, 26, 12155–12164.10.1021/la101179yGoogle Scholar
Isa, H.W.M., Johari, W.L.W., Syahi, A., Abd Shukor, M.Y., Nor Azwady, A.A., Shaharuddin, N.A. & Muskhazli, M. (2014) Development of a bacterial-based tetrazo-lium dye (MTT) assay for monitoring of heavy metals. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 16, 1123–1128.Google Scholar
Joussein, E., Petit, S., Churchman, J., Theng, B., Righi, D. & Delvaux, B. (2005) Halloysite clay minerals - a review. Clay Minerals, 40, 383–426.10.1180/0009855054040180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konnova, S.A., Sharipova, I.R., Demina, T.A., Osin, Y.N., Yarullina, D.R., Ilinskaya, O.N., Lvov, Y.M. & Fakhrullin, R.F. (2013) Biomimetic cell-mediated three-dimensional assembly of halloysite nanotubes. Chemical Communications, 49, 4208–4210.10.1039/c2cc38254gCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lvov, Y.M., Aerov, A. & Fakhrullin, R.F. (2014) Clay nanotube encapsulation for functional biocomposites. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 207, 189–198.10.1016/j.cis.2013.10.006Google Scholar
Lvov, Y.M., Wang, W., Zhang, L. & Fakhrullin, R.F. (2016) Halloysite clay nanotubes for loading and sustained release of functional compounds. Advanced Materials, 28, 1227–1250.10.1002/adma.201502341Google Scholar
Massaro, M., Riela, S., Cavallaro, G., Colletti, C.G., Milioto, S., Noto, R., Parisi, F. & Lazzara, G. (2015) Palladium supported on halloysite-triazolium salts as a catalyst for ligand free Suzuki cross-coupling in water under microwave irradiation. Journal of Molecular CatalysisA: Chemical, 408, 12–19.10.1016/j.molcata.2015.07.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Safarik, I., Pospiskova, K., Horska, K. & Safarikova, M. (2012) Potential of magnetically responsive (nano) biocomposites. Soft Matter, 8, 5407–5413.10.1039/c2sm06861cGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y. & Yang, H. (2012) Halloysite nanotubes coated with magnetic nanoparticles. Applied Clay Science, 56, 97–102.10.1016/j.clay.2011.11.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar