Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-w5hgh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T21:15:10.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Multipartite Version of the Hajnal–Szemerédi Theorem for Graphs and Hypergraphs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2012

ALLAN LO and
KLAS MARKSTRÖM
ALLAN LO
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK (e-mail: s.a.lo@bham.ac.uk)
KLAS MARKSTRÖM
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics, Umeå University, S-901 87 Umeå, Sweden (e-mail: klas.markstrom@math.umu.se)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

A perfect Kt-matching in a graph G is a spanning subgraph consisting of vertex-disjoint copies of Kt. A classic theorem of Hajnal and Szemerédi states that if G is a graph of order n with minimum degree δ(G) ≥ (t − 1)n/t and t|n, then G contains a perfect Kt-matching. Let G be a t-partite graph with vertex classes V1, …, Vt each of size n. We show that, for any γ > 0, if every vertex x ∈ Vi is joined to at least $\bigl ((t-1)/t + \gamma \bigr )n$ vertices of Vj for each j ≠ i, then G contains a perfect Kt-matching, provided n is large enough. Thus, we verify a conjecture of Fischer [6] asymptotically. Furthermore, we consider a generalization to hypergraphs in terms of the codegree.

Keywords

Primary 05C65Secondary 05C7005C07

Information

Type
Paper
Information
Combinatorics, Probability and Computing , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , January 2013, pp. 97 - 111
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

References

[1]Aharoni, R., Georgakopoulos, A. and Sprüssel, P. (2009) Perfect matchings in r-partite r-graphs. Europ. J. Combin. 30 39–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Alon, N., Frankl, P., Huang, H., Rödl, V., Ruciński, A. and Sudakov, B. (2012) Large matchings in uniform hypergraphs and the conjectures of Erdős and Samuels. J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 119 1200–1215.Google Scholar
[3]Alon, N. and Spencer, J. H. (2000) The Probabilistic Method, second edition. Wiley–Interscience Series in Discrete Mathematics and Optimization.Google Scholar
[4]Csaba, B. and Mydlarz, M. (2012) Approximate multipartite version of the Hajnal–Szemerédi theorem. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 102 395–410.Google Scholar
[5]Daykin, D. E. and Häggkvist, R. (1981) Degrees giving independent edges in a hypergraph. Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 23 103–109.Google Scholar
[6]Fischer, E. (1999) Variants of the Hajnal–Szemerédi theorem. J. Graph Theory 31 275–282.Google Scholar
[7]Frankl, P. and Rödl, V. (1985) Near perfect coverings in graphs and hypergraphs. Europ. J. Combin. 6 317–326.Google Scholar
[8]Hajnal, A. and Szemerédi, E. (1970) Proof of a conjecture of P. Erdős. In Combinatorial Theory and its Applications II: Proc. Colloq., Balatonfüred, 1969, North-Holland, pp. 601–623.Google Scholar
[9]Hàn, H., Person, Y. and Schacht, M. (2009) On perfect matchings in uniform hypergraphs with large minimum vertex degree. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 23 732–748.Google Scholar
[10]Han, J. and Zhao, Y. (2012) On multipartite Hajnal–Szemerédi theorems. arXiv:1203.2667Google Scholar
[11]Johansson, R. (2000) Triangle-factors in a balanced blown-up triangle. Discrete Math. 211 249–254.Google Scholar
[12]Keevash, P. (2011) A hypergraph blow-up lemma. Random Struct. Alg. 39 275–376.Google Scholar
[13]Keevash, P. and Mycroft, R. (2011) A geometric theory for hypergraph matching. arXiv:1108.1757Google Scholar
[14]Keevash, P. and Mycroft, R. (2012) A multipartite Hajnal–Szemerédi theorem. arXiv:1201.1882Google Scholar
[15]Kühn, D. and Osthus, D. (2006) Matchings in hypergraphs of large minimum degree. J. Graph Theory 51 269–280.Google Scholar
[16]Lo, A. and Markström, K. (2011) F-factors in hypergraphs via absorption. arXiv:1105.3411Google Scholar
[17]Lo, A. and Markström, K. (2011) Perfect matchings in 3-partite 3-uniform hypergraphs. arXiv:1103.5654Google Scholar
[18]Lovász, L. and Plummer, M. D. (1986) Matching Theory. Vol. 121 of North-Holland Mathematics Studies, North-Holland.Google Scholar
[19]Magyar, C. and Martin, R. (2002) Tripartite version of the Corrádi–Hajnal theorem. Discrete Math. 254 289–308.Google Scholar
[20]Martin, R. and Szemerédi, E. (2008) Quadripartite version of the Hajnal–Szemerédi theorem. Discrete Math. 308 4337–4360.Google Scholar
[21]Pikhurko, O. (2008) Perfect matchings and K 34-tilings in hypergraphs of large codegree. Graphs Combin. 24 391–404.Google Scholar
[22]Rödl, V., Ruciński, A. and Szemerédi, E. (2009) Perfect matchings in large uniform hypergraphs with large minimum collective degree. J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 116 613–636.Google Scholar