Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T02:24:07.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Probably Intersecting Families are Not Nested

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2012

PAUL A. RUSSELL
Affiliation:
Department of Pure Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WB, UK (e-mail: P.A.Russell@dpmms.cam.ac.uk)
MARK WALTERS
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical Sciences, Queen Mary, University of London, London E1 4NS, UK (e-mail: m.walters@qmul.ac.uk)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

It is well known that an intersecting family of subsets of an n-element set can contain at most 2n−1 sets. It is natural to wonder how ‘close’ to intersecting a family of size greater than 2n−1 can be. Katona, Katona and Katona introduced the idea of a ‘most probably intersecting family’. Suppose that is a family and that 0 < p < 1. Let (p) be the (random) family formed by selecting each set in independently with probability p. A family is most probably intersecting if it maximizes the probability that (p) is intersecting over all families of size ||.

Katona, Katona and Katona conjectured that there is a nested sequence consisting of most probably intersecting families of every possible size. We show that this conjecture is false for every value of p provided that n is sufficiently large.

Keywords

Information

Type
Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012