Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-zsp5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T20:58:44.573Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“The Dutch Revolt Anatomized”. Some Comments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

I. Schöffer
I. Schöffer
Affiliation:
University of Western Australia
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Gordon Griffiths and George Nadel have shown convincingly that the Revolt of the Netherlands shows some resemblance to the four great revolutions—the English, American, French and Russian revolutions—that Crane Brinton analyzed and compared in his stimulating work The Anatomy of Revolution. Both authors have been perhaps too modest. The resemblances are even more striking than they suggested; the Dutch Revolt had some features in common with the other revolutions which did not receive sufficient consideration in Brinton's analysis

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , July 1961, pp. 470 - 477
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 Comparative Studies in Society and History, II, 4 (07, 1960), pp. 452–87.Google Scholar

2 Reassuring and stimulating thoughts against such feelings are expressed by Brinton, Crane in his Anatomy of Revolution (New York, 1952, rev. ed.), pp. 6–21.Google Scholar

3 Though never neglected this period has received fuller treatment in recent publications, cf. Dierickx, M., “De eerste jaren van Filips II 1555–1567”, in Algemene Geschiedenis der Nederlanden, V (1952), pp. 345–50 in particular, and Kuttner, quoted below.Google Scholar

4 In the revised edition (1952) on p. 170.

5 This is the case in particular in the research on the French Revolution, started by Mathiez and G. Lefèbvre and now followed up by a school of historians like Cobb, Markow, Rudé, Soboul, Tønneson, etc.

5 An interesting book, in which this endemic stage of riots and revolts is described for France before the Fronde: Porshnev, B. F., Die Volksaufstände in Frankreich vor der Fronde 1623–1648, German translation from Russian (Leipzig, 1954)Google Scholar. An excellent example of a doctrinaire Marxist approach, with all the qualities and disqualities of its rigidity. Cf. Hobsbawn, E. J., Primitive Rebels. Studies in Archaic Forms of Social Movement in the 19th and 20th Centuries (Manchester, 1959), pp. 108–25 on the “City Mob”.Google Scholar

7 Labrousse, E., La Crise de l' économie à la fin de l' Ancien Régime et au Début de la Révolution, I (Paris, 1943).Google Scholar

8 Kuttner, E., Het Hongerjaar 1566 (Amsterdam, 1949). Original and stimulating. Marxist in its approach and sometimes unreliable in method, and for these reasons up till now overlooked.Google Scholar

9 The attraction of Calvinism for guild members, used to strict rules and envious of the rich and wealthy, prone to exalt thrift and sobriety, has been emphasized by vanGelder, H. A. Enno, Vrijheid en Onvrijheid in de Republiek, I (Haarlem, 1947), pp. 70–3.Google Scholar

10 Most extensive in Kuttner, op. cit.

11 Lefèbvre, G., La Grande Peur de 1789 (Paris, 1932).Google Scholar

12 vanHerwerden, P. J., Bij den oorsprong van onze onafhankelijkheid (Groningen-Batavia, 1947), pp. 94–99.Google Scholar

13 Griffiths, op. cit., p. 458–9.

14 Griffiths, op. cit., p. 459.

15 In the works of Pieter de la Court (1662) and Spinoza; cf. Kossmann, E. H., Politieke theorie in het zeventiende-eeuwse Nederland (Amsterdam, 1960), pp. 36–59.Google Scholar

16 Rudé, G., The Crowd in the French Revolution (Oxford, 1959), pp. 225–28.Google Scholar

17 Griewank, K., Der neuzeitliche Revolutionsbegriff: Entstehung and Entwicklung (Weimar, 1955). Though posthumously published and therefore rather fragmentary, an excellent work, not infected by Soviet doctrines.Google Scholar