Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-mnklg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T08:06:35.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Counting resolutions of symplecticquotient singularities

Part of:Lie algebras and Lie superalgebrasRings and algebras arising under various constructionsBirational geometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2015

Gwyn Bellamy
Gwyn Bellamy*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, University Gardens, University of Glasgow, GlasgowG12 8QW, UK email gwyn.bellamy@glasgow.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Let ${\rm\Gamma}$ be a finite subgroup of $\text{Sp}(V)$. In this article we count the number of symplectic resolutions admitted by the quotient singularity $V/{\rm\Gamma}$. Our approach is to compare the universal Poisson deformation of the symplectic quotient singularity with the deformation given by the Calogero–Moser space. In this way, we give a simple formula for the number of $\mathbb{Q}$-factorial terminalizations admitted by the symplectic quotient singularity in terms of the dimension of a certain Orlik–Solomon algebra naturally associated to the Calogero–Moser deformation. This dimension is explicitly calculated for all groups ${\rm\Gamma}$ for which it is known that $V/{\rm\Gamma}$ admits a symplectic resolution. As a consequence of our results, we confirm a conjecture of Ginzburg and Kaledin.

Keywords

symplectic resolutionssymplectic reflection algebrasOrlik–Solomon algebras

MSC classification

Primary:14E15: Global theory and resolution of singularities
Secondary:14E30: Minimal model program (Mori theory, extremal rays)16S80: Deformations of rings17B63: Poisson algebras

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Compositio Mathematica , Volume 152 , Issue 1 , January 2016, pp. 99 - 114
Copyright
© The Author 2015 

References

Athanasiadis, C. A., Generalized Catalan numbers, Weyl groups and arrangements of hyperplanes, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 36 (2004), 294–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, G., On singular Calogero–Moser spaces, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 41 (2009), 315–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, G. and Martino, M., On the smoothness of centres of rational Cherednik algebras in positive characteristic, Glasg. Math. J. 55 (2013), 27–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, G. and Schedler, T., A new linear quotient of C4 admitting a symplectic resolution, Math. Z. 273 (2013), 753–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, G. and Schedler, T., On the (non)existence of symplectic resolutions for imprimitive symplectic reflection groups, Math. Res. Lett., to appear, arXiv:1309.3558.Google Scholar
Bonnafé, C. and Rouquier, R., Cellules de Calogero–Moser, Preprint (2013), arXiv:1302.2720.Google Scholar
Bosma, W., Cannon, J. and Playoust, C., The Magma algebra system. I: The user language, J. Symbolic Comput. 24 (1997), 235–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braden, T., Proudfoot, N. and Webster, B., Quantizations of conical symplectic resolutions I: Local and global structure, Preprint (2012), arXiv:1208.3863v3.Google Scholar
Crawley-Boevey, W., On the exceptional fibres of Kleinian singularities, Amer. J. Math. 122 (2000), 1027–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donten-Bury, M. and Wiśniewski, J. A., On 81 symplectic resolutions of a 4-dimensional quotient by a group of order 32, Preprint (2014), arXiv:1409.4204v3.Google Scholar
Etingof, P. and Ginzburg, V., Symplectic reflection algebras, Calogero–Moser space, and deformed Harish–Chandra homomorphism, Invent. Math. 147 (2002), 243–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, B., A survey on symplectic singularities and symplectic resolutions, Ann. Math. Blaise Pascal 13 (2006), 209–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginzburg, V. and Kaledin, D., Poisson deformations of symplectic quotient singularities, Adv. Math. 186 (2004), 1–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez-Sprinberg, G. and Verdier, J.-L., Construction géométrique de la correspondance de McKay, Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4) 16 (1984), 409–449; 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, I. G., Quiver varieties, category 𝓞 for rational Cherednik algebras, and Hecke algebras, Int. Math. Res. Pap. IMRP (2008), Art. ID rpn00669.Google Scholar
Hatcher, A., Algebraic topology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002).Google Scholar
Kaledin, D., Dynkin diagrams and crepant resolutions of quotient singularities, Preprint (1999),arXiv:9903157.Google Scholar
Lehn, M., Namikawa, Y. and Sorger, Ch., Slodowy slices and universal Poisson deformations, Compositio Math. 148 (2012), 121–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehn, M. and Sorger, C., A symplectic resolution for the binary tetrahedral group, Sémin. Congr. 25 (2010), 427–433.Google Scholar
Losev, I., Completions of symplectic reflection algebras, Selecta Math. (N.S.) 18 (2012), 179–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Losev, I., Isomorphisms of quantizations via quantization of resolutions, Adv. Math. 231 (2012), 1216–1270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martino, M., Stratifications of Marsden-Weinstein reductions for representations of quivers and deformations of symplectic quotient singularities, Math. Z. 258 (2008), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Namikawa, Y., A note on symplectic singularities, Preprint (2001), arXiv:0101028.Google Scholar
Namikawa, Y., Flops and Poisson deformations of symplectic varieties, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 44 (2008), 259–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Namikawa, Y., Poisson deformations of affine symplectic varieties, II, Kyoto J. Math. 50 (2010), 727–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Namikawa, Y., Poisson deformations of affine symplectic varieties, Duke Math. J. 156 (2011), 51–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Namikawa, Y., Poisson deformations and birational geometry, J. Math. Sci. Univ. Tokyo. 22 (2015), 339–359.Google Scholar
Orlik, P. and Terao, H., Arrangements of hyperplanes, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 300 (Springer, Berlin, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slodowy, P., Four lectures on simple groups and singularities, Communications of the Mathematical Institute, Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht, vol. 11 (Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht, Mathematical Institute, Utrecht, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar