Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T19:52:29.574Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Hodge ring of Kähler manifolds

Part of:Surfaces and higher-dimensional varietiesBirational geometryDifferential topologyComplex manifoldsCycles and subschemes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2013

D. Kotschick and
S. Schreieder
D. Kotschick
Affiliation:
Mathematisches Institut, LMU München, Theresienstr. 39, 80333 München, Germany email dieter@member.ams.org
S. Schreieder
Affiliation:
Mathematisches Institut, LMU München, Theresienstr. 39, 80333 München, Germany email stefan.schreieder@googlemail.comTrinity College, Cambridge, CB2 1TQ, UK email stefan.schreieder@googlemail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

We determine the structure of the Hodge ring, a natural object encoding the Hodge numbers of all compact Kähler manifolds. As a consequence of this structure, there are no unexpected relations among the Hodge numbers, and no essential differences between the Hodge numbers of smooth complex projective varieties and those of arbitrary Kähler manifolds. The consideration of certain natural ideals in the Hodge ring allows us to determine exactly which linear combinations of Hodge numbers are birationally invariant, and which are topological invariants. Combining the Hodge and unitary bordism rings, we are also able to treat linear combinations of Hodge and Chern numbers. In particular, this leads to a complete solution of a classical problem of Hirzebruch’s.

Keywords

Hodge numbersChern numbersHirzebruch problem

MSC classification

Secondary:32Q15: Kähler manifolds14C30: Transcendental methods, Hodge theory , Hodge conjecture14E99: None of the above, but in this section14J80: Topology of surfaces (Donaldson polynomials, Seiberg-Witten invariants)57R77: Complex cobordism (${rm U}$- and ${rm SU}$-cobordism)

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Compositio Mathematica , Volume 149 , Issue 4 , April 2013, pp. 637 - 657
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2013

References

Griffiths, P. and Harris, J., Principles of algebraic geometry (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1978).Google Scholar
Hirzebruch, F., The index of an oriented manifold and the Todd genus of an almost complex manifold, 1953 manuscript published in [Hir87].Google Scholar
Hirzebruch, F., Some problems on differentiable and complex manifolds, Ann. of Math. (2) 60 (1954), 213–236; reprinted in [Hir87].Google Scholar
Hirzebruch, F., Gesammelte Abhandlungen, Band I (Springer, New York, 1987).Google Scholar
Kervaire, M., Le théorème de Barden–Mazur–Stallings, Comment. Math. Helv. 40 (1965), 31–42.Google Scholar
Kotschick, D., Orientation–reversing homeomorphisms in surface geography, Math. Annalen 292 (1992), 375–381.Google Scholar
Kotschick, D., Orientations and geometrisations of compact complex surfaces, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 29 (1997), 145–149.Google Scholar
Kotschick, D., Chern numbers and diffeomorphism types of projective varieties, J. Topology 1 (2008), 518–526.Google Scholar
Kotschick, D., Characteristic numbers of algebraic varieties, Proc. Natl. Acad. USA 106 (2009), 10114–10115.Google Scholar
Kotschick, D., Pontryagin numbers and nonnegative curvature, J. Reine Angew. Math. 646 (2010), 135–140.Google Scholar
Kotschick, D., Topologically invariant Chern numbers of projective varieties, Adv. Math. 229 (2012), 1300–1312.Google Scholar
Milnor, J. W., On the cobordism ring ${\Omega }^{\star } $ and a complex analogue, Part I, Amer. J. Math. 82 (1960), 505–521; reprinted in [Mil07].Google Scholar
Milnor, J. W., Collected papers of John Milnor, III. Differential topology (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2007).Google Scholar
Novikov, S. P., Homotopy properties of Thom complexes, Mat. Sb. (N.S.) 57 (1962), 407–442 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Novikov, S. P., Topological invariance of rational classes of Pontrjagin, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 163 (1965), 298–300 (in Russian); English translation in Soviet Math. Dokl. 6 (1965), 921–923.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, J., An analogue of the Novikov conjecture in complex algebraic geometry, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 360 (2008), 383–394.Google Scholar
Schreieder, S., Dualization invariance and a new complex elliptic genus, J. Reine Angew. Math. to appear; doi:10.1515/crelle-2012-008.Google Scholar
Simpson, C. T., The construction problem in Kähler geometry, in Different faces of geometry, International Mathematical Series (New York), vol. 3, eds Donaldson, S. K., Eliashberg, Y. and Gromov, M. (Kluwer/Plenum, New York, 2004), 365–402.Google Scholar
Smale, S., On the structure of manifolds, Amer. J. Math. 84 (1962), 387–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thom, R., Travaux de Milnor sur le cobordisme, Séminaire Bourbaki, vol. 5, Exp. No. 180 (Société Mathématique de France, Paris, 1995), 169–177; reprinted in [Mil07].Google Scholar
Voisin, C., On the cohomology of algebraic varieties, in Proceedings of the international congress of mathematicians (ICM2010), vol. I (Hindustan Book Agency, New Delhi, 2010), 476–503.Google Scholar
Wall, C. T. C., On simply-connected 4-manifolds, J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 39 (1964), 141–149.Google Scholar