Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T21:12:05.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crisis of Democracy?

Recognizing the Democratic Potential of Alternative Forms of Political Participation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Brendan McCaffrie and
Sadiya Akram
Brendan McCaffrie*
Affiliation:
Institute for Governance and Policy Analysis, University of Canberra
Sadiya Akram*
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London
*
Brendan.McCaffrie@canberra.edu.au
s.akram@qmul.ac.uk
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

According to the mainstream literature on political participation, declining rates of voting and party and interest group membership reflect a crisis of democracy in Western democracies. In this article, we challenge this view by highlighting the rise of alternative forms of political participation that operate outside formal arenas. We suggest that the mainstream approach ignores such forms of political participation for two reasons: First, it operates with a narrow arena definition of politics; second, it is based on the assumption that non-participation in arena politics results from political apathy. We suggest that there is not a crisis of political participation, but there is a growing crisis in engagement resulting from an uncoupling between citizens and the state. Halting this form of democratic decline through a recoupling process will require changes on the part of governments and citizens.

Keywords

apathydemocratic declinepolitical participationrecouplinguncoupling

Information

Type
Is Democracy in Crisis?
Information
Democratic Theory , Volume 1 , Issue 2: The Crisis of Democracy: Which Crisis? Which Democracy? , December 2014, pp. 47 - 55
Copyright
Copyright © Democratic Theory 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Almond, Gabriel, and Sidney, Verba. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bang, Henrik P. 2009. “‘Yes We Can’: Identity Politics and Project Politics for a Late-Modern World.” Urban Research and Practice 2 (2): 117–137.10.1080/17535060902979022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bang, Henrik P. 2011. “The Politics of Threat: Late-Modern Politics in the Shadow of Neo-Liberalism.” Critical Policy Studies 5 (4): 434–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Lance W., and Alexandra, Segerberg. 2012. “The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics.” Information, Communication and Society 15 (5): 739–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulpitt, Jim. 1986. “The Discipline of the New Democracy: Mrs Thatcher's Domestic Statecraft.” Political Studies 34 (1): 19–39.10.1111/j.1467-9248.1986.tb01870.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, Roger. 2008. “Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation.” Political Studies 56 (1): 76–98.10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00718.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fawcett, Paul, and David, Marsh. 2014. “Depoliticisation, Governance and Political Participation.” Policy and Politics 42 (2): 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flinders, Matt. 2012. Defending Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199644421.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flinders, Matt, and Matt, Wood. 2014. “Depoliticisation, Governance and the State.” Policy and Politics 42 (2): 135–149.10.1332/030557312X655873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, Colin. 2007. Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Karpf, David. 2010. “Online Political Mobilization from the Advocacy Group's Perspective: Looking Beyond Clicktivism.” Policy and Internet 2 (4): 7–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macedo, Stephen, Alex-Assensoh, Yvette, Berry, Jeffrey M., Brintnall, Michael, Campbell, David E., Fraga, Luis Ricardo, Fung, Archon, et al. 2005. Democracy at Risk: How Political Choices Undermine Citizen Participation, and What We Can Do About It. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Nevitte, Neil. 1996. The Decline of Deference. Peterborough: Broadview Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2002. Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511610073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development. 2011. Society at a Glance 2011: OECD Social Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Stoker, Gerry. 2006. Why Politics Matters: Making Democracy Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Van Laer, Jeroen, and Peter, Van Aelst. 2010. “Internet and Social Movement Action Repertoires: Opportunities and Limitations.” Information, Communication and Society 14 (8): 1146–1171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vegh, Sandor. 2003. “Classifying Forms of Online Activism: The Case of Cyberprotests Against the World Bank.” Pp. 71–95 in Cyberactivism: Online Activism in Theory and Practice, ed. McCaughey, Martha and Ayers, Michael D.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vromen, Ariadne, and William, Coleman. 2011. “Online Movement Mobilisation and Electoral Politics. The Case of GetUp!” Communication, Politics and Culture 44 (2): 76–94.Google Scholar
Whitely, Paul F. 2011. “Is the Party Over? The Decline of Party Activism and Membership across the Democratic World.” Party Politics 17 (1): 21–44.10.1177/1354068810365505CrossRefGoogle Scholar