Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-th4rj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T21:15:21.666Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Against Analogy

Why Analogical Arguments in Support of Workplace Democracy Must Necessarily Fail

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Roberto Frega
Roberto Frega*
Affiliation:
CNRS (French National Center for Scientific Research) in Paris
*
E-mail: fregarob@gmail.com
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article asks whether the analogy between state and firm is a promising strategy for promoting workplace democracy and provides a negative answer, explaining why analogical arguments are not a good strategy for justifying workplace democracy. The article contends that the state-firm analogy is misguided for at least three reasons: (1) it is structurally inconclusive, (2) it is based on a category mistake, and (3) it leads us away from the central question we should ask, which is: What would concretely imply, and what is required, in order to democratize the workplace? I begin by offering an interpretation of the state-firm analogy which shows that use of the analogical argument in Dahl's justification of workplace democracy engenders excessive and unnecessary theoretical costs which bear negatively on his conclusion. I then proceed to examine more recent contributions to the debate and show that supporters and critics of the state-firm analogy alike do not advance our understanding of the analogical argument. In the last part of the article I provide a general theoretical explanation of why arguments based on the state-firm analogy are not good candidates for defending workplace democracy.

Keywords

workplace democracyanalogyparallel argumentRobert Dahlsocial interactionismpragmatism

Information

Type
Research Articles
Information
Democratic Theory , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , June 2020, pp. 1 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © Berghahn Books 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, Elizabeth. 2017. Private Government: How Employers Rule Our Lives (and Why We Don't Talk about It). Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Arneson, Richard. 1987. “Meaningful work and market socialism.” Ethics 97(3): 517–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneson, Richard. 1993. Democratic rights at national and workplace level. In The idea of democracy, ed. David, Copp, Jean, Hampton John, Roemer, 118–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aronovitch, Hilliard. 1997. “The political importance of analogical argument.” Political Studies 45(1): 78–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartha, Paul. 2010. By parallel reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, Arthur. 1908. The Process of Government, a Study of Social Pressures by Arthur F. Bentley. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Breen, Keith. 2015. “Freedom, republicanism, and workplace democracy.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 18(4): 470–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, Thomas. 2010. “The uneasy relationship between democracy and capital.” Social Philosophy and Policy 27(1): 195–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciepley, David. 2013. “Beyond Public and Private: Toward a Political Theory of the Corporation.” American Political Science Review 107(1): 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1986. A preface to economic democracy. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1989. Democracy and its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1927. The Public and its Problems. The Later Works, 1925-1953, vol. 2 Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dow, Gregory. 2003. Governing the firm: workers’ control in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreras, Isabelle. 2017. Firms as Political Entities: Saving Democracy Through Economic Bicameralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, Janice R and Michael, Polanyi. 2006. “Workplace democracy: Why bother?” Economic and Industrial Democracy 27(1): 173–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Follett, Mary Parker. 1918. The new state: Group organization the solution of popular government. Cambridge, UK: Longmans, Green and Company.Google Scholar
Forde, Chris, Gary, Slater and David A, Spencer. 2006. “Fearing the worst? Threat, participation and workplace productivity.” Economic and Industrial democracy 27(3): 369–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Steven. 2007. “Effects of ESOP adoption and employee ownership: Thirty years of research and experience.” Graduate Division, School of Arts and Sciences Center for Organizational Dynamics Working Paper 07-01.Google Scholar
Frega, Roberto. 2020. “Democratic patterns of interaction as a norm for the workplace.” Journal of Social Philosophy 5(1): 27–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frega, Roberto, Lisa, Herzog, and Christopher, Neuhauser. 2019. “Workplace Democracy – the recent debate.” Philosophy Compass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Ricoy, Iñigo. 2014a. “Firms, States and Democracy.” Law, Ethics and Philosophy.Google Scholar
González-Ricoy, Iñigo. 2014b. “The republican case for workplace democracy.” Social theory and practice 40(2): 232–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, Carol. 1988. Rethinking democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Edward. 1986. Workplace democracy: The political effects of participation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert. 1970. Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge Ma: Harvard university press.Google Scholar
Hirst, Paul. 2005. The pluralist theory of the state: selected writings of G.D.H. Cole, J.N. Figgis and H.J. Laski. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, Nien-hê. 2008. “Survey article: Justice in production.” Journal of Political Philosophy 16(1): 72–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karasek, Robert A. 2004. “Job socialization: The carry-over effects of work on political and leisure activities.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 24(4): 284–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, Jack James, Johnson. 2011. The Priority of Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Landemore, Hélène and Isabelle, Ferreras. 2016. “In Defense of Workplace Democracy: Towards a Justification of the Firm–State Analogy.” Political Theory 44(1): 53–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez-Guerra, Claudio. 2008. “Against the Parallel Case for Workplace Democracy.” Revue de philosophie économique 9(1): 11–28.Google Scholar
Malleson, Tom. 2013. “Making the case for workplace democracy: Exit and voice as mechanisms of freedom in social life.” Polity 45(4): 604–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malleson, Tom. 2014. After occupy: Economic democracy for the 21st century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, Robert. 2000. “Is there a moral right to workplace democracy?” Social theory and practice 26(2): 301–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, Robert. 2001a. “Michael Walzer, industrial democracy, and complex equality.” Political theory 29(2): 237–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, Robert. 2001b. “Robert Dahl and the right to workplace democracy.” The Review of Politics 63(2): 221–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, Christopher. 1994. Authority and democracy. A General Theory of Government and Management. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Moriarty, Jeffrey. 2005. “On the relevance of political philosophy to business ethics.” Business Ethics Quarterly 15(3): 455–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narveson, Jan. 1992. “Democracy and economic rights.” Social Philosophy and Policy 9(1): 29–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1970. Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Robert A Joshua D, Margolis. 1999. “Toward an ethics of organizations.” Business Ethics Quarterly 9(4): 619–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pircher Verdorfer, Armin and Wolfgang G, Weber. 2016. “Examining the link between organizational democracy and employees’ moral development.” Journal of Moral Education 45(1): 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabine, George H. 1932. “Hegel's Political Philosophy.” The Philosophical Review 41(3): 261–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaff, Kory P. 2012. “Democratic Rights in the Workplace.” Inquiry 55(4): 386–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Nicholas Jean-Philippe, Deranty, eds. 2011. New philosophies of labour: work and the social bond. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1993. “On analogical reasoning.” Harvard Law Review 106(3): 741–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Alan. 2016. Republic of equals: Predistribution and property-owning democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veltman, Andrea. 2016. Meaningful work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Wolfgang G. 1999. “Organisationale Demokratie-Anregungen fur innovative Arbeitsformen jenseits blosser Partizipation?” Zeitschrift fur Arbeitswissenschaft 53(4): 270–281.Google Scholar
Weber, Wolfgang G, Christine, Unterrainer and Birgit E, Schmid. 2009. “The influence of organizational democracy on employees’ socio-moral climate and prosocial behavioral orientations.” Journal of organizational behavior 30(8): 1127–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon S. 1969. “Political theory as a vocation.” American Political Science Review 63(4): 1062–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeoman, Ruth. 2014. Meaningful work and workplace democracy: A philosophy of work and a politics of meaningfulness. Houndmills, Balsingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar