Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T22:11:19.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can't Live With Them, Can't Live Without Them

Why Politicians Matter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Paul Fawcett
Paul Fawcett*
Affiliation:
Institute for Governance and Policy Analysis, University of Canberra; The Department of Government and International Relations, University of Sydney
*
paul.fawcett@canberra.edu.au
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Distrust towards politicians is often identified as a key factor behind the current “crisis of democracy.” If there is a crisis, it only seems natural that at least some responsibility must rest with the political elite. This article locates this distrust in the context of broader debates about “antipolitics” and depoliticization. It examines how these debates have been informed by the putatively new set of challenges presented by the shift to governance and changing notions of legitimacy. The article concludes that politicians remain a necessity, not a choice. Politicians might be part of the problem, but they are certainly not the only problem. It ends by calling for a re-articulation of the relationship between government and citizens and leadership and democracy.

Keywords

anti-politicsdepoliticizationgovernancelegitimacypoliticians

Information

Type
Which Crisis of Democracy?
Information
Democratic Theory , Volume 1 , Issue 2: The Crisis of Democracy: Which Crisis? Which Democracy? , December 2014, pp. 67 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © Democratic Theory 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Allen, Nicholas, and Sarah, Birch. forthcoming. Ethics and Integrity in British Politics: How Citizens Judge Their Politicians’ Conduct and Why It Matters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107279568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bang, Henrik P. 2009. “Political Community: The Blind Spot of Modern Democratic Decision-Making.” British Politics 4 (1): 100–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bang, Henrik P. 2011. “The Politics of Threats: Late-Modern Politics in the Shadow of Neoliberalism.” Critical Policy Studies 5 (4): 434–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bang, Henrik P., and Anders, Esmark. 2009. “Good Governance in Network Society: Reconfiguring the Political from Politics to Policy.” Administrative Theory & Praxis 31 (1): 7–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, Richard, and Dario, Castiglione. 2013. “Three Models of Democracy, Political Community and Representation in the EU.” Journal of European Public Policy 20 (2): 206–223.10.1080/13501763.2013.746118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilakovics, Steven. 2012. Democracy without Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 10.4159/harvard.9780674062931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, Andrew. 2013. The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chou, Mark. 2014. “Democrats against Democracy.” Cultural Politics 10 (2): 163–181.10.1215/17432197-2651756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Jack. 2014. “Diagnosing the Demonization of Politicians: A Review and an Agenda.” unpublished.Google Scholar
Crozier, Michael P. 2010. “Rethinking Systems: Configurations of Politics and Policy in Contemporary Governance.” Administration and Society 42 (5): 504–525.10.1177/0095399710377443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. 2004. Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268436.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della, Porta, Donatella. 2013. Can Democracy Be Saved? Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Fawcett, Paul, and David, Marsh. 2014. “Depoliticisation, Governance and Political Participation.” Policy & Politics 42 (2): 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fawcett, Paul, Rob Manwaring, and David, Marsh. 2011. “Network Governance and the 2020 Summit.” Australian Journal of Political Science 46 (4): 651–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flinders, Matthew. 2012. Defending Politics: Why Democracy Matters in the Twenty-First Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, Colin. 2007. Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hay, Colin. 2013. “From Politics to Politicisation: Defending the Indefensible?” Politics, Groups, and Identities 1 (1): 109–112.10.1080/21565503.2012.760315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Head, Brian W., and Jon, Alford. forthcoming. “Wicked Problems: Implications for Public Policy and Management.” Administration & Society. http://aas.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/03/27/0095399713481601.abstract (accessed 1 July 2014).Google Scholar
Ipsos, MORI. 2013. “Trust in Professions.” http://www.ipsos-mori.com/researchpublications/researcharchive/15/Trust-in-Professions.aspx?view=wide (accessed 1 July 2014).Google Scholar
Jensen, Michael J., and Henrik, P. Bang. 2013. “Occupy Wall Street: A New Political Form of Movement and Community?” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 10 (4): 444–461.10.1080/19331681.2013.803948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Martin, and Wegrich, Kai eds. 2012. Executive Politics in Times of Crisis. Houndmills: Palgrave. 10.1057/9781137010261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mair, Peter. 2013. Ruling the Void: The Hollowing-Out of Western Democracy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Medvic, Stephen K. 2012. In Defense of Politicians: The Expectations Trap and Its Threat to Democracy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2011. Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulous, Yannis. 2013. Democracy in Crisis? Politics, Governance and Policy. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. A. W. 2007. “Understanding Governance: Ten Years On.” Organization Studies 28 (8): 1243–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, R. A. W. 2011. Everyday Life in British Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles F., and Zeitlin, Jonathan eds. 2010. Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz. 1999. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198295457.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien A. 2013. “Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union Revisited: Input, Output and ‘Throughput.’” Political Studies 61 (1): 2–22.10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00962.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Graeme. 2009. Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoker, Gerry. 2006. Why Politics Matters: Making Democracy Work. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Strömbäck, Jesper, and Van Aelst, Peter. forthcoming. “Why Political Parties Adapt to the Media: Exploring the Fourth Dimension of Mediatization.” International Communication Gazette. http://gaz.sagepub.com/content/75/4/341 (accessed 1 July 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sydney Morning Herald. 2013. “Kevin Rudd's Speech.” 27 June.Google Scholar
Tiernan, Anne, and Patrick, Weller. 2010. Learning to be a Minister: Heroic Expectations, Practical Realities. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Warren, Mark E. 2009. “Governance-driven Democratization.” Critical Policy Studies 3 (1): 3–13.10.1080/19460170903158040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Matthew, and Matthew, Flinders. 2014. “Rethinking Depoliticisation: Beyond the Governmental.” Policy & Politics 42 (2): 151–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar