Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T15:36:09.751Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Contextual risk and resiliency during late adolescence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2009

Alfred L. Baldwin*
Affiliation:
University of Rochester
Clara P. Baldwin*
Affiliation:
University of Rochester
Timothy Kasser
Affiliation:
University of Rochester
Melvin Zax
Affiliation:
University of Rochester
Arnold Sameroff
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Ronald Seifer
Affiliation:
Bradley Hospital for Children
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Alfred and Clara Baldwin, Senior Research Associates, University of Rochester, Department of Psychology, Rochester, NY 14627.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Alfred and Clara Baldwin, Senior Research Associates, University of Rochester, Department of Psychology, Rochester, NY 14627.

Abstract

The factors contributing to the mental health of a sample of 18-year-olds were analyzed in a hierarchical multiple regression analysis. The contribution of proximal variables such as parenting behavior, intermediate variables such as other family factors, and the more distal variables such as social class and minority status were all highly significant. Child variables were also found to make significant contributions to understanding mental health. When the sample was divided into three subsamples, white advantaged, white disadvantaged, and African American (almost entirely disadvantaged), the mental health of the African American sample was higher than that of the white disadvantaged sample. The regression coefficients fit to the whole sample underestimated the mental health of the African Americans and overestimated the health of the white disadvantaged. The parenting of the African American sample was less approving and more critical and more controlling than that of the other two samples. To investigate the correlates of resilience, pairs of subjects were contrasted who had the same mental health but differed in whether they exceeded or were less than the mental health predicted for them. None of the variables in the study differentiated significantly between the two groups.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable