Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T05:36:32.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Semiotics and its Range

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Silvana Paruolo
Get access

Extract

If it is true that semiotics has tried to establish itself as an autonomous science starting with Saussure and Peirce, in imposing itself as a cultural fashion since the 1960’s, due especially to Roland Barthes and his interest in the language of connotations, it is also true that from ancient treatises of medicine to books of magic, from rhetoric to logic, from nature to science, symbols— even from different points of view—have been the object of passionate reflections.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Diogenes , Volume 29 , Issue 113-114 , March 1981 , pp. 127 - 156
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie / International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP)

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Austin, J.L., How to do things with words, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Barthes, R., Le Degré zéro de l'écriture, Ed. Seuil, du, 1953; in economic edition with Les Élements de sémiologie (1964), Gonthier, Mediations, 1965.Google Scholar
Barthes, R., S/Z, Ed. du Seuil, 1970.Google Scholar
Benveniste, E., Prohlèmes de linguistique générale, Gallimard, 1966.Google Scholar
Bettetini, G., Produzione del senso e messa in scena, Milan, Bompiani, 1975.Google Scholar
Buyssen, E., La Communication et l'articulation linguistique, Brussels, Presses universitaires de Bruxelles, 1970.Google Scholar
Calabrese, O., Mucci, E., Guida alla semiotica, with an essay by Prietro, Florence, Sansoni, 1975.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N., Cartesian Linguistics, New York, Harper & Row, 1966.Google Scholar
Derrida, J., De la grammatologie, Ed. de Minuit, 1967.Google Scholar
Derrida, J., L'Écriture et la différence, Ed. du Seuil, 1967.Google Scholar
Eco, U., Apocalittici e integreti, Milan, Bompiani, 1964.Google Scholar
Eco, U., Opera aperta, Milan, Bompiani, 1962.Google Scholar
Eco, U., Trattato di semiotica generale, Milan, Bompiani, 1975.Google Scholar
Eco, U., Lector in fabula, la cooperazione interpretativa nei testi narrativi, Milan, Bompiani, 1979.Google Scholar
Greimas, A.J., Sémantique structurale, Larousse, 1966.Google Scholar
Greimas, A.J., Du sens, Ed. du Seuil, 1970.Google Scholar
Greimas, A.J., Sémiotique et sciences sociales, Ed. du Seuil, 1976.Google Scholar
Greimas, A.J., Courtes, J., eds., Sémiotique, dictionnaire raisonné de la théorie du langage, Hachette Université, 1979.Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, L., Prolégomènes à une théorie du langage. Ed. de Minuit, 1968.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R., Essais de linguistique générale, Ed. de Minuit, 1963.Google Scholar
Kristeva, J., (recherches pour une sémanalyse), Ed. du Seuil, Tel Quel, 1969.Google Scholar
Kristeva, J., Les mutations sémiotiques, Panorama des sciences humaines, under the direction of Denis Hollier, N.R.F., 1970.Google Scholar
Kristeva, J., La Révolution du langage poétique (l'avant-garde à la fin du XIXe siècle, Lautréamont et Mallarmé), Ed. du Seuil, Tel Quel, 1974.Google Scholar
Kristeva, J., Polylogue, Ed. du Seuil, Tel Quel, 1975.Google Scholar
Kristeva, J., Pouvoirs de l'horreur, essai sur l'abjection, Ed. du Seuil, Tel Quel, 1980.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, G., Anthropologie structurale, Librairie Plon, 1958.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, G., Mythologiques I, Le cru et le cuit, Librairie Plon, 1964.Google Scholar
Lotman, Y.M., Uspenskij, B.A., Tipologia della cultura, Milan, Bompiani, 1975.Google Scholar
Lotman, Y.M., Uspenskij, B.A., (ed.) Travaux sur les systèmes de signes: École de Tartu, tr. from Russian by Zouboff, A., Brussels, Ed. Complexe, 1976.Google Scholar
Martinet, A., Éléments de linguistique générale, Colin, 1964.Google Scholar
Meyer, H., Le prolongement de la doctrine stoïcienne dans la langue contemporaine, Revue philosophique, 1956.Google Scholar
Metz, C., Essais de sémiotique, Paris, Klincksieck, 1977.Google Scholar
Morris, C., Foundations of the Theory of Signs, Chicago, The Chicago University Press, 1938.Google Scholar
Morris, C., Science, art and technology, Kenyon Review, 4.Google Scholar
Morris, C., Signs, Language and Behavior, Chicago, The Chicago University Press, 1946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, C., Writings in the General Theory of Signs. La Haye, Mouton, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Ch. S., Collected Papers. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1931–35.Google Scholar
Prieto, L., Messages et signaux, P.U.F., 1966.Google Scholar
Prieto, L., Pertinence et pratique: essai de sémiologie, Ed. de Minuit, 1975.Google Scholar
de Saussure, F., Cours de linguistique générale. published by C. Bally and A. Sechehaye with the collaboration of A. Riedlinger, Paris, Payot, 1962.Google Scholar
Searle, J.R., Les Actes de langage, essai de philosophie du langage (Fr. trad.), Hermann, 1972.Google Scholar
Starobinski, J., Les Mots sous les mots, Gallimard, 1971.Google Scholar