Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-mnklg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T12:36:26.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Authority in the Anglican Communion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Edward Norman
Edward Norman
Affiliation:
Canon of York Minster
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

The Church was not founded at Pentecost, as is sometimes said, but by Christ during the course of his ministry in Galilee and Judea. It was he who appointed the twelve to become what today, perhaps, would be called teaching officers, and who commissioned the seventy as a corps of evangelistic missioners. In the ancient world religious knowledge was sometimes committed to sacred writings, sometimes to a school of ideas, sometimes to a priestly caste or an assemblage of cultic observances, and sometimes it emerged episodically through the translations of oracles. Christ, in contrast, revealed his truth to a living company of people—‘the People of God—who, after his corporeal departure, became his body on earth. Precisely because the message was thus conveyed organically it remained permanently new: able to adapt to changing intellectual modes and social filtration, capable of bringing forward fresh insights in the successive cultural shifts of a progressive humanity. Written texts do not transmit truth of themselves: they require re-interpretation, over long periods of time, if they are to achieve durable meaning. Priestly castes have the disadvantage of imploding into small coteries of exclusivity; they frequently become a mere adjunct of ruling elites. Philosophical systems tend to die when the surrounding culture to which they originally related transforms itself or disintegrates. But a living body of people, at the centre of whose religious insights is not a set of ideas but a person, has the verifiable capability of enduring through the centuries, forever changing yet forever the same.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Ecclesiastical Law Journal , Volume 5 , Issue 24 , January 1999, pp. 172 - 187
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical Law Society 1999

References

1 Catechism of the Catholic Church (Rome, 1994: English edition 1994). Chapter Two, Art 2. III, 95.Google Scholar

2 See Newman, John Henry. Apologia Pro Vita Sua (Oxford. 1931 edn). pp 212f.Google Scholar

3 Sykes, Stephen W. The Integrity of Anglicanism (London, 1978). p ix.Google Scholar

4 Sachs, William L. The Transformation of Anglicanism: From State Church to Global Communion (Cambridge. 1993). p 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 Wright, J Robert, ‘The Authority of Lambeth Conferences. 1867–1988’. in Lytle, G F (ed). Lambeth Conferences, Past and Present (Cincinnati, 1989). p 282.Google Scholar

6 Evans, G R and Wright, J Robert (ed). The Anglican Tradition: A Handbook of Sources (London. 1991). P xv.Google Scholar

7 Doctrine in the Church of England: The Report of the Commission on Christian Doctrine appointed by the Archbishops and Canterbury and York in 1922 (London [1938] 1962 edition), p 4Google Scholar (Chairman's Introduction by William Temple. Archbishop of York).

8 Ibid. p 39.

9 Ibid. p 35.

10 Sachs, . The Transformation of Anglicanism, p 2.Google Scholar

11 Bayne, Stephen JrAn Anglican Turning Point: Documents and Interpretations (Austin, Texas, 1964). p 117.Google Scholar

12 Ibid, p 271 (Sermon preached at the opening of the Canadian General Synod. 1962).

13 See Bricknell, W S (ed). The Judgment of the Bishops upon Tractarian Theology (Oxford. 1845).Google Scholar

14 Stephenson, Alan M G. Anglicanism and the Lambeth Conferences (London. 1978). p 2.Google Scholar

15 Tucker, H W. Memoir of the Life and Episcopate of George Augustus Selwyn DD (London. 1879). I. p 158.Google Scholar

16 Stephenson, . Anglicanism and the Lambeth Conferences, p 38.Google Scholar

17 See MacCulloch, Diarmaid. Thomas Cranmer: A Life (Yale. 1996). p 185.Google Scholar

18 Evans, and Wright, (ed). The Anglican Tradition, p 328.Google Scholar

19 Sachs, . The Transformation of Anglicanism, p 203.Google Scholar

20 Essays on Various Subjects by His Eminence Cardinal Wiseman (London. 1853). II. p 306Google Scholar: ‘The Anglican System’ (1842).

21 Evans, G R. Problems of Authority in the Reformation Debates (Cambridge, 1992). p 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

22 Sykes, . The Integrity of Anglicanism, p 47.Google Scholar

23 Supremacy of the Crown Act 1534 (26 Hen 8 c 1): text in Evans, and Wright, (ed). The Anglican Tradition. p 136.Google Scholar

24 Waddams, S M. Law, Politics and the Church of England: The Career of Stephen Lushington, 1782–1873 (Cambridge, 1992). p 274Google Scholar: Gorham v Bishop of Exeter (1850) 7 Notes of Cases 413. PC.Google Scholar

25 Waddams, . Law, Politics and the Church of England, p 316Google Scholar: Bishop of Salisbury v Williams (1862) 1 New Rep 196Google Scholar; on appeal. Williams v Bishop of Salisbury (1864) Moo PCC 375.Google Scholar

26 Sykes, . The Integrity of Anglicanism, p 88.Google Scholar

27 The Lambeth Conference. 1948: The Encyclical Letter from the Bishops, together with Resolutions and Reports (London, 1948). p 84Google Scholar (Report IV. ‘The Anglican Communion’).

28 Ibid, p 84.

29 Ibid, p 85.

30 Sykes, . The Integrity of Anglicanism. p 89.Google Scholar

31 Ibid, p 94.

32 Ibid, p 98.

33 Norman, E R. ‘Anglicanism and the Lambeth Conference of 1988’ in Anglicanism and Episcopal History. LVIII. p 3 (09 1989).Google Scholar

34 Hooker, Richard. Of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity [1593–1597] (London. Everyman Edn. 1954) I. p 119 (v1 3).Google Scholar