Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-cbk24 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T18:06:26.798Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Doctrine and Discipline

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

David Hope
David Hope
Affiliation:
Archbishop of York
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

In a concluding article as co-patron of the Ecclesiastical Law Society,1 the Most Reverend and Right Honourable Dr David Hope offers a reflection on his personal experiences of the interplay between doctrine and discipline encountered during his period of office as Archbishop of York. He focuses on censures of deprivation and disqulification under section 55 of the Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction Measure 1963; deposition appeals; summary revocation of clerical licences; and the Lambeth and Bishopthorpe Register.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Ecclesiastical Law Journal , Volume 8 , Issue 36 , January 2005, pp. 32 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical Law Society 2005

References

1 For an earlier contribution, see Hope, D, ‘The Letter Killeth, But The Spirit Giveth Life’ (1997) 4 Ecc LJ 694, an address given to the Society's Residential Conference in Manchester on 14 03 1997.Google Scholar

2 Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction Measure 1963, s55(2), (3) (substituted by the Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction (Amendment) Measure 1974, ss 1, 3(2), and amended by the Church of England (Miscellaneous Provisions) Measure 1992, s 7(a)).Google Scholar

3 See Hill, M, Ecclesiastical Law (2nd edn. Oxford University Press, 2001), para 4.30, particularly n 141.Google Scholar

4 The case is briefly noted as Brown v Bishop of Carlisle at (2003) 7 Ecc LJ 239.Google Scholar