Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T22:42:33.661Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The New Testament, Mosaic Law and Ecclesiastical Law Today

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Anthony Bash
Anthony Bash
Affiliation:
Solicitor, Bishop of Hull's Chaplain to the Legal Profession
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

This article explores the New Testament's critique of Old Testament law, a genus of positive law. It looks at the applicability of that critique to modern ecclesiastical law: The article identifies three common misconceptions about the view of the New Testament concerning Old Testament law, and then sets out what the New Testament does say about Old Testament law, principally from the writings of St Paul. The principles underlying the New Testament's critique are established. The critique is made not on natural law grounds but on pragmatic and utilitarian grounds. The grounds of the critique are (i) the efficacy of the law to achieve its true intent; and (ii) the extent to which human beings exaggerate the usefulness of Old Testament law.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Ecclesiastical Law Journal , Volume 8 , Issue 36 , January 2005, pp. 60 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical Law Society 2005

References

1 This is an edited and adapted version of a paper given at a conference on 23 February 2004 at the University of Hull to celebrate the golden jubilee of the teaching of theology at the University.Google Scholar

2 Sanders, E P, Paul and Palestinian Judaism (SCM Press, London, 1977)Google Scholar and Paul, the Law and the Jewish People (SCM Press, London, 1983). Sanders' views have been further developed and refined by, among others, most notably J D G Dunn and N T Wright, now the Bishop of Durham.Google Scholar

3 References are to St Paul's Letter to the Romans unless stated otherwise.Google Scholar

4 Here I offer my apologies to those who do not like a neologism derived from discrete Greek and Latin roots: ‘nomostreph’ or ‘legovert’ may satisfy the purist but they lack elegance and impact.Google Scholar