1. Davidson, R. & MacKinnon, J.G.. Implicit alternatives and the local power of test statistics. Econometrica 55 (1987): 1305–1329.10.2307/1913558CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. Eisenhart, C. The power of the X ² test (abstract). Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 44 (1938): 32.Google Scholar

3. Gallant, A.R. Nonlinear Statistical Models. New York: Wiley, 1987.10.1002/9780470316719CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4. Gallant, A.R. & White, H.. A Unified Theory of Estimation and Inference for Nonlinear Dynamic Models. New York: Basil Blackwell, 1988.Google Scholar

5. Hendry, D.F. Monte Carlo experimentation in econometrics. In Griliches, Z. and Intriligator, M. (eds.). Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 2, Chapter 16. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1984.Google Scholar

6. LeCam, L. & Lehmann, E.L.. , J. Neyman-on the occasion of his 80th birthday. Annals of Statistics 2 (1974): vii-xiii.10.1214/aos/1176342703CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. Nelson, F.D. & Savin, N.E.. The danger of extrapolating asymptotic local power. Econometrica 58 (1990): 977–981.10.2307/2938360CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8. Newey, W.K. Maximum likelihood specification testing and conditional moment tests. Econometrica 53 (1985): 1047–1070.10.2307/1911011CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9. Neyman, J. “Smooth” test for goodness of fit. Skandinavisk Aktuarietiskrift 20 (1937): 149–199.Google Scholar

10. Neyman, J. Comments on, W. Hoeffding's asymptotically optimal tests for multinomial distributions. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 36 (1965): 401–405.10.1214/aoms/1177700151CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11. Neyman, J. & Pearson, E.S.. On the use and interpretation of certain test criteria for purposes of statistical inference. Biometrica 20-A (1928): 175–240 and 263–294.Google Scholar

12. Neyman, J. & Pearson, E.S.. On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses. Philosophic Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A 231 (1933): 289–337.10.1098/rsta.1933.0009Google Scholar

13. Neyman, J. & Pearson, E.S.. The testing of statistical hypotheses in relation to probabilities a priori. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 29 (1933): 492–510.10.1017/S030500410001152XCrossRefGoogle Scholar

14. Noether, G.E. Asymptotic properties of the Wald-Wolfowitz test of randomness. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 21 (1950): 231–246.10.1214/aoms/1177729841CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15. Noether, G.E. On a theorem of Pitman. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 26 (1955): 64–68.10.1214/aoms/1177728593CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16. Noether, G.E. Nonparametrics: the early years–impressions and recollections. The American Statistician 38 (1984): 173–178.Google Scholar

17. Pitman, E.J.G. Lectures on non-parametric inference. Columbia University, Spring Semester, 1948.Google Scholar

18. Pitman, E.J.G. Some Basic Theory for Statistical Inference. New York: Wiley, 1979.Google Scholar

19. Rothenberg, T.J. Comparing alternative asymptotically equivalent tests. In Hildenbrand, W. (ed.), Advances in Econometrics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

20. Rothenberg, T.J. Approximating the distributions of econometric estimators and test statistics. In Griliches, Z. & Intriligator, M. (eds.), Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 2, Chapter 14. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1984.Google Scholar

21. Rothenberg, T.J. Approximate power functions for some robust tests of regression coefficients. Econometrica 56 (1988): 997–1019.10.2307/1911356CrossRefGoogle Scholar

22. Saikkonen, P. Asymptotic relative efficiency of the classical test statistics under misspecification. Journal of Econometrics 42 (1989): 351–369.10.1016/0304-4076(89)90058-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar