Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T06:55:48.682Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

BOOTSTRAPPING DENSITY-WEIGHTED AVERAGE DERIVATIVES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2014

Matias D. Cattaneo ,
Richard K. Crump  and
Michael Jansson
Matias D. Cattaneo
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Michigan
Richard K. Crump
Affiliation:
Capital Markets Function, Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Michael Jansson
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, UC Berkeley and CREATES
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

We investigate the properties of several bootstrap-based inference procedures for semiparametric density-weighted average derivatives. The key innovation in this paper is to employ an alternative asymptotic framework to assess the properties of these inference procedures. This theoretical approach is conceptually distinct from the traditional approach (based on asymptotic linearity of the estimator and Edgeworth expansions), and leads to different theoretical prescriptions for bootstrap-based semiparametric inference. First, we show that the conventional bootstrap-based approximations to the distribution of the estimator and its classical studentized version are both invalid in general. This result shows a fundamental lack of “robustness” of the associated, classical bootstrap-based inference procedures with respect to the bandwidth choice. Second, we present a new bootstrap-based inference procedure for density-weighted average derivatives that is more “robust” to perturbations of the bandwidth choice, and hence exhibits demonstrable superior theoretical statistical properties over the traditional bootstrap-based inference procedures. Finally, we also examine the validity and invalidity of related bootstrap-based inference procedures and discuss additional results that may be of independent interest. Some simulation evidence is also presented.

Information

Type
ARTICLES
Information
Econometric Theory , Volume 30 , Issue 6 , December 2014 , pp. 1135 - 1164
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

References

REFERENCES

Aradillas-Lopéz, A., Honoré, B.E., & Powell, J.L. (2007) Pairwise difference estimation with nonparametric control variables. International Economic Review 48, 1119–1158.Google Scholar
Bickel, P.J. & Freedman, D.A. (1981) Some asymptotic theory for the bootstrap. Annals of Statistics 9(6), 1196–1217.Google Scholar
Cattaneo, M.D., Crump, R.K., & Jansson, M. (2010) Robust data-driven inference for density-weighted average derivatives. Journal of the American Statistical Association 105(491), 1070–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattaneo, M.D., Crump, R.K., & Jansson, M. (2014) Small bandwidth asymptotics for density-weighted average derivatives. Econometric Theory 30(1), 176–200.Google Scholar
Cattaneo, M.D., Crump, R.K., & Jansson, M. (2013) Generalized jackknife estimators of weighted average derivatives (with comments and rejoinder). Journal of the American Statistical Association 108(504), 1243–1268.Google Scholar
Chen, X., Linton, O., & van Keilegom, I. (2003) Estimation of semiparametric models when the criterion function is not smooth. Econometrica 71(5), 1591–1608.Google Scholar
Cheng, G. & Huang, J.Z. (2010) Bootstrap consistency for general semiparametric M-estimation. Annals of Statistics 38(5), 2884–2915.Google Scholar
Efron, B. & Stein, C. (1981) The jackknife estimate of variance. Annals of Statistics 9(3), 586–596.Google Scholar
Gine, E. & Zinn, J. (1990) Bootstrapping general empirical measures. Annals of Probability 18(2), 851–869.Google Scholar
Hall, P. (1992) The Bootstrap and Edgeworth Expansions. Springer.Google Scholar
Härdle, W. & Tsybakov, A. (1993) How sensitive are average derivatives? Journal of Econometrics 58, 31–48.Google Scholar
Heyde, C.C. & Brown, B.M. (1970) On the departure from normality of a certain class of martingales. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 41(6), 2161–2165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, J. (2001) The bootstrap. In Heckman, J. & Leamer, E. (eds.), Handbook of Econometrics, vol. V, pp. 3159–3228. Elsevier Science B.V.Google Scholar
Li, Q. & Racine, S. (2007) Nonparametric Econometrics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Newey, W.K., Hsieh, F., & Robins, J.M. (2004) Twicing kernels and a small bias property of semiparametric estimators. Econometrica 72, 947–962.Google Scholar
Nishiyama, Y. & Robinson, P.M. (2000) Edgeworth expansions for semiparametric averaged derivatives. Econometrica 68(4), 931–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishiyama, Y. & Robinson, P.M. (2001) Studentization in Edgeworth expansions for estimates of semiparametric index models. In Hsiao, C., Morimune, K., & Powell, J.L. (eds.), Nonlinear Statistical Modeling: Essays in Honor of Takeshi Amemiya, pp. 197–240. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nishiyama, Y. & Robinson, P.M. (2005) The bootstrap and the Edgeworth correction for semiparametric averaged derivatives. Econometrica 73(3), 197–240.Google Scholar
Politis, D. & Romano, J. (1994) Large sample confidence regions based on subsamples under minimal assumptions. Annals of Statistics 22(4), 2031–2050.Google Scholar
Politis, D., Romano, J., & Wolf, M. (1999) Subsampling. Springer.Google Scholar
Powell, J.L., Stock, J.H., & Stoker, T.M. (1989) Semiparametric estimation of index coefficients. Econometrica 57(6), 1403–1430.Google Scholar
Powell, J.L. & Stoker, T.M. (1996) Optimal bandwidth choice for density-weighted averages. Journal of Econometrics 75(2), 291–316.Google Scholar
Robinson, P.M. (1995) The normal approximation for semiparametric averaged derivatives. Econometrica 63, 667–680.Google Scholar
Stoker, T.M. (1986) Consistent estimation of scaled coefficients. Econometrica 54(6), 1461–1481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiong, S. & Li, G. (2008) Some results on the convergence of conditional distributions. Statistics and Probability Letters 78(18), 3249–3253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar